Abstract
AbstractThis paper presents three cascade algorithms for combined acoustic feedback cancelation (AFC) and noise reduction (NR) in speech applications. A prediction error method (PEM)-based adaptive feedback cancelation (PEM-based AFC) algorithm is used for the AFC stage, while a multichannel Wiener filter (MWF) is applied for the NR stage. A scenario with M microphones and 1 loudspeaker is considered, without loss of generality. The first algorithm is the baseline algorithm, namely the cascade M-channel rank-1 MWF and PEM-AFC, where a NR stage is performed first using a rank-1 MWF followed by a single-channel AFC stage using a PEM-based AFC algorithm. The second algorithm is the cascade $$(M+1)$$
(
M
+
1
)
-channel rank-2 MWF and PEM-AFC, where again a NR stage is applied first followed by a single-channel AFC stage. The novelty of this algorithm is to consider an ($$M+1$$
M
+
1
)-channel data model in the MWF formulation with two different desired signals, i.e., the speech component in the reference microphone signal and in the loudspeaker signal, both defined by the speech source signal but not equal to each other. The two desired signal estimates are later used in a single-channel PEM-based AFC stage. The third algorithm is the cascade M-channel PEM-AFC and rank-1 MWF where an M-channel AFC stage is performed first followed by an M-channel NR stage. Although in cascade algorithms where NR is performed first and then AFC the estimation of the feedback path is usually affected by the NR stage, it is shown here that by performing a rank-2 approximation of the speech correlation matrix this issue can be avoided and the feedback path can be correctly estimated. The performance of the algorithms is assessed by means of closed-loop simulations where it is shown that for the considered input signal-to-noise ratios (iSNRs) the cascade $$(M+1)$$
(
M
+
1
)
-channel rank-2 MWF and PEM-AFC and the cascade M-channel PEM-AFC and rank-1 MWF algorithms outperform the cascade M-channel rank-1 MWF and PEM-AFC algorithm in terms of the added stable gain (ASG) and misadjustment (Mis) as well as in terms of perceptual metrics such as the short-time objective intelligibility (STOI), perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ), and signal distortion (SD).
Funder
Onderzoeksraad, KU Leuven
Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
H2020 European Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Acoustics and Ultrasonics
Reference36 articles.
1. T. van Waterschoot, M. Moonen, Fifty years of acoustic feedback control: state of the art and future challenges. Proc. IEEE 99(2), 288–327 (2011)
2. M. Guo, S.H. Jensen, J. Jensen, Evaluation of state-of-the-art acoustic feedback cancellation systems for hearing aids. J. Audio Eng. Soc. 61(3), 125–137 (2013)
3. M. Guo, S.H. Jensen, J. Jensen, Novel acoustic feedback cancellation approaches in hearing aid applications using probe noise and probe noise enhancement. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 20(9), 2549–2563 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/TASL.2012.2206025
4. M. Guo, S.H. Jensen, J. Jensen, S.L. Grant, in Proc. 20th European Signal Process. Conf. (EUSIPCO ’12). On the use of a phase modulation method for decorrelation in acoustic feedback cancellation. (2012). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6333787/authors#authors
5. H. Schepker, S.E. Nordholm, L.T.T. Tran, S. Doclo, Null-steering beamformer-based feedback cancellation for multi-microphone hearing aids with incoming signal preservation. IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 27(4), 679–691 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/TASLP.2019.2892234
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献