Transportability of tertiary qualifications and CPD: A continuing challenge for the global health workforce

Author:

Saltman Deborah C,Kidd Michael R,Jackson Debra,Cleary Michelle

Abstract

Abstract Background In workforces that are traditionally mobile and have long lead times for new supply, such as health, effective global indicators of tertiary education are increasingly essential. Difficulties with transportability of qualifications and cross-accreditation are now recognised as key barriers to meeting the rapidly shifting international demands for health care providers. The plethora of mixed education and service arrangements poses challenges for employers and regulators, let alone patients; in determining equivalence of training and competency between individuals, institutions and geographical locations. Discussion This paper outlines the shortfall of the current indicators in assisting the process of global certification and competency recognition in the health care workforce. Using Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) data we highlight how International standardisation in the tertiary education sector is problematic for the global health workforce. Through a series of case studies, we then describe a model which enables institutions to compare themselves internally and with others internationally using bespoke or prioritised parameters rather than standards. Summary The mobility of the global health workforce means that transportability of qualifications is an increasing area of concern. Valid qualifications based on workplace learning and assessment requires at least some variables to be benchmarked in order to judge performance.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Education,General Medicine

Reference13 articles.

1. Cleary M, et al: The views of mental health nurses on continuing professional development. J Clin Nurs. 2011, 20 (23–24): 3561-3566.

2. Davenport N, Spath M, Blauvelt M: A step-by-step approach to curriculum review. Nurse Educ. 2009, 34 (4): 181-185. 10.1097/NNE.0b013e3181aaba80.

3. Spendolini M: The benchmarking book. 1992, Amacom, New York

4. Hase H, OECD Thematic Review of Tertiary Education: Comparative Indicators on Tertiary Education; 1st Workshop of Participating Countries. OECD Directorate for Education: Education and Training Policy Division. 2005, www.oecd.org/dataoecd/56/63/35940816.ppt.

5. OECD: Education at a glance: OECD indicators 2005. 2005, 520-http://www.oecd.org/document/34/0,3746,en_2649_39263238_35289570_1_1_1_1,00.html.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3