Trust in science and scientists among university students, staff, and faculty of a large, diverse university in Los Angeles during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Trojan Pandemic Response Initiative

Author:

Nicolo Michele,Kawaguchi Eric,Ghanem-Uzqueda Angie,Soto Daniel,Deva Sohini,Shanker Kush,Lee Ryan,Gilliland Frank,Klausner Jeffrey D.,Baezconde-Garbanati Lourdes,Kovacs Andrea,Van Orman Sarah,Hu Howard,Unger Jennifer B.

Abstract

Abstract Background Mistrust in science and scientists may adversely influence the rate of COVID-19 vaccination and undermine public health initiatives to reduce virus transmission. Methods Students, staff and faculty responded to an email invitation to complete an electronic survey. Surveys included 21-items from the Trust in Science and Scientists Inventory questionnaire. Responses were coded so higher scores indicated a higher trust in science and scientists, A linear regression model including sex, age group, division, race and ethnicity, political affiliation, and history of COVID-19, was used to determine variables significantly associated with trust in science and scientists scores at the p < 0.05 level. Results Participants were mostly female (62.1%), Asian (34.7%) and White (39.5%) and students (70.6%). More than half identified their political affiliation as Democrat (65%). In the final regression model, all races and ethnicities had significantly lower mean trust in science and scientists scores than White participants [Black ($$B$$= -0.42, 95% CI: -0.55, -0.43, p < 0.001); Asian ($$B$$= -0.20, 95% CI: -0.24, -0.17, p < 0.001); Latinx ($$B$$= -0.22, 95% CI: -0.27, -0.18, p < 0.001); Other ($$B$$= -0.19, 95% CI: -0.26, -0.11, p < 0.001)]. Compared to those identifying as Democrat, all other political affiliations had significantly lower mean scores. [Republican ($$B$$ =-0.49, 95% CI: -0.55, -0.43, p < 0.0001); Independent ($$B$$ =-0.29, 95% CI: -0.33, -0.25, p < 0.0001); something else ($$B$$ =-0.19, 95% CI: -0.25, -0.12, p < 0.0001)]. Having had COVID-19 ($$B$$= -0.10, 95% CI: -0.15, -0.06, p < 0.001) had significantly lower scores compared to those who did not have COVID-19. Conclusion Despite the setting of a major research University, trust in science is highly variable. This study identifies characteristics that could be used to target and curate educational campaigns and university policies to address the COVID19 and future pandemics.

Funder

Foundation for the National Institutes of Health

Keck Medicine Foundation

University of Southern California Office of the Provost

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3