Author:
Wong Gretel Jianlin,Lau Jerrald,Chew Emily,Chow Wen-Min,Choo Julia,Tan Ker-Kan
Abstract
Abstract
Background
All patients who underwent curative resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) are frequently reviewed in tertiary institutions to ensure timely detection of any disease recurrence. There has been no local study that evaluated the feasibility of monitoring their condition in the community as a possible new model of care. This study henceforth seeks to understand CRC patients’ views and receptiveness of having their surveillance consultations conducted in a community setting.
Methods
We convenience sampled Stage I and II CRC patients who were within five years post-operation in the outpatient clinics. An open-ended questionnaire aimed at elucidating their perception towards cancer surveillance in a community setting was administered. Content analysis was used to group and quantify responses from participants.
Results
Twenty-five participants agreed to participate in the study. Only 48% of the participants felt that having phlebotomy procedures in a community or home setting was acceptable. Participants were less willing to be reviewed by a physician who is not their primary surgeon, with only 32% agreeable to seeing a different doctor for surveillance if given a choice. However, most participants were open to having a telephone consultation in place of a physical face-to-face consultation before (72%) and after (76%) going through medical imaging.
Conclusions
Participants remained keen to be managed by their primary surgeons and were hesitant towards having their follow-up surveillance consultations in community and primary care settings. Further studies should be conducted to understand whether these perceptions are generalisable, and if more can be done to change public perception towards the role of community and primary care institutions.
Funder
National Medical Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference13 articles.
1. Colorectal cancer statistics. https://www.wcrf.org/dietandcancer/cancer-trends/colorectal-cancer-statistics. 2019.
2. National Registry of Diseases Office Singapore Cancer Registry Annual Registry Report 2015. https://www.nrdo.gov.sg/docs/librariesprovider3/Publications-Cancer/cancer-registry-annual-report-2015_web.pdf?sfvrsn=10. 2017.
3. Meyerhardt JA, Mangu PB, Flynn PJ, Korde L, Loprinzi CL, Minsky BD, et al. Follow-up care, surveillance protocol, and secondary prevention measures for survivors of colorectal cancer: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline endorsement. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(35):4465–70. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.50.7442.
4. Kobayashi H, Mochizuki H, Sugihara K, Morita T, Kotake K, Teramoto T, et al. Characteristics of recurrence and surveillance tools after curative resection for colorectal cancer: a multicenter study. Surgery. 2007;141(1):67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2006.07.020.
5. Yamano T, Yamauchi S, Tsukamoto K, Noda M, Kobayashi M, Hamanaka M, et al. Evaluation of appropriate follow-up after curative surgery for patients with colorectal cancer using time to recurrence and survival after recurrence: a retrospective multicenter study. Oncotarget. 2018;9(39):25474–90. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.25312.