Author:
Rahimisadegh Rohaneh,Noori Hekmat Somayeh,Mehrolhassani Mohammad Hossein,Jafari Sirizi Mohammad
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Identifying and exploiting stewardship and financing challenges in Iran’s health insurance system as an ecosystem is essential to achieving predetermined goals. This study aimed to determine the challenges and strategies in the Iranian health insurance ecosystem to provide relevant evidence to healthcare managers and policymakers to improve its functions and perform necessary reforms.
Method
This qualitative study was conducted at the national level in Iran. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and analyzed using the directed content analysis method. The study participants included managers and experts in health insurance and faculty of universities of medical sciences, who were selected by purposive sampling.
Results
The challenges and strategies expressed by participants were categorized into two functions: stewardship and financing. Four main themes, ten subthemes, 22 challenges, and 24 strategies were identified in the stewardship function, along with three main themes, 12 subthemes, 17 challenges, and 16 strategies in the financing function. The major challenge in the Iranian health insurance ecosystem was the complexity and conflict of interests between multiple actors with different roles, which led to fragmentation, diverse structures, and a gap between other functions and objectives, hindering the effective functioning of the ecosystem.
Conclusion
In order to deal with the challenges of the health insurance ecosystem, it is suggested to create a coherent insurance system through a single utility system, and by paying more attention to health-oriented services, the health insurance ecosystem becomes a health-oriented system instead of being treatment-oriented. In addition, in order to strengthen the governance of the country’s health insurance ecosystem, the number of actors with multiple roles should be reduced and the roles of the actors should be clarified and separated in order to prevent conflicts of interest and structural corruption in this ecosystem.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. Jacobides MG, Cennamo C, Gawer A. Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strateg Manag J. 2018;39(8):2255–76.
2. BaghbadoraniFathi M, Harandi A. A conceptual model for business ecosystem and implications for future research. Int Proc Econ Dev Res. 2012;52(17):82–6.
3. Zheng M. Business ecosystem modeling- the hybrid of system modeling and ecological modeling: an application of the smart grid. Energy Inf. 2019;2(35):1–24.
4. Moore JF. Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Rev. 1993;71(3):75–86.
5. Suh J, Sohn SY. Analyzing technological convergence trends in a business ecosystem. Industrial Manage Data Syst. 2015;115(4):718–39.