Abstract
Abstract
Background
This study analyzed the association between depressive symptoms and employment type, by considering both socioeconomic status and job stress factors.
Methods
We analyzed 27,369 participants (13,134 men and 14,235 women) using data from the fifth Korean Working Conditions Survey. The participants were divided into regular and precarious workers. Depressive symptoms were defined using the World Health Organization-5 Well-Being Index. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between depressive symptoms and employment type.
Results
Of the participants, 71.53% (N = 19578) were regular workers and 28.47% (N = 7791) were precarious workers. The weighted frequencies of participants with depressive symptoms (42.50%) were significantly higher than those of precarious workers (32.54%, p < 0.001). In the univariate and multivariate analyses, precarious workers had a significantly higher risk of depressive symptoms than regular workers (odds ratio [OR] 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42–1.64; OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.07–1.26, respectively). The significant association between depressive symptoms and precarious workers has also been reflected in propensity score matched participants through crude and multivariate analysis (OR 1.54 [95% CI 1.43–1.66] and OR 1.15 [95% CI 1.04–1.26], respectively).
Conclusions
The findings suggest that precarious workers may have a higher risk of depressive symptoms than regular workers. However, this is only a cross-sectional study. Therefore, further study is required to investigate the relevance association between depressive symptoms and employment types.
Funder
Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference32 articles.
1. ILO. Non-standard employment around the world: understanding challenges, shaping prospects. Geneva: International Labour Office; 2016.
2. Famira-Muehlberger U. Precarious Work. In: Michalos AC, editor. Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014. p. 5000–3 (https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2237).
3. Jang S. A study on the definition of non-regular workers and its scale in Korea. Korean J Ind Relat. 2012;22:55–77.
4. Chung D-B. The relationship between regular/irregular workers and job satisfaction - the comparison of group differences among young workers. Q J Lab Policy. 2018;18:105–30.
5. Kim WY. The size of nonregular workers and the analysis of its recent trend. J Labour Economics. 2014;37:143–57.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献