Abstract
Abstract
Background
Food diets are complex and a policy targeting one item of a person’s diet does not affect their nutritional intake in a solely additive or subtractive manner. Policies tackling unhealthy diets are more likely to be adopted by governments if there is robust evidence to support them. To evaluate dietary policies, it is important to understand the correlations and interdependencies between food groups, as these can lead to unintended negative consequences. We aimed to see whether reductions in consumption of a particular group is related to a net improvement in nutritional intake, after taking into account patterns of consumption and substitution across food groups.
Methods
Detailed dietary data was collected using a 24-h online dietary assessment from the UK Biobank and Oxford Web Q (n = 185,611). We used panel data fixed effects methods to estimate changes in energy, saturated fat, total sugar, and fibre following a 100gram reduction across 44 food groups. We compare these estimates against the average nutritional value of that food group from the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey.
Results
We find evidence of variation in whether a food is compensated between the main confectionery products. Crisps, savoury snacks, and sugar confectionery are less likely to be compensated, whereas chocolate confectionery, biscuits, and buns/cakes/pastries and pies are compensated. The result is particularly striking for chocolate confectionery which shows that while chocolate confectionery often has a high energy content, eating less chocolate confectionery is not associated with an equal reduction in energy. Instead, we find individuals switch or compensate for their reduction in chocolate confectionery consumption with other high energy food items.
Conclusions
We find that sugar confectionery and crisps and savoury snacks are less likely to result in substitution than chocolate confectionery. This would suggest that food policies aiming to reduce the consumption of these food groups are more likely to result in overall lower consumption of unhealthy foods.
Funder
School for Public Health Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference23 articles.
1. Obesity-Update OOECD. 2017 Available from: https://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems. Obesity-Update-2017 pdf. 2017.
2. OECD. The Heavy Burden of Obesity [Internet]. 2019. 256 p. Available from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/publication/67450d67-en
3. of Health D, Care S. Restricting promotions of products high in fat, sugar and salt by location and by price: government response to public consultation. DHSC London, UK; 2020.
4. Jones A, Polden M, Robinson E. Assessing public perception and awareness of UK mandatory calorie labelling in the out-of-home sector. using Twitter and Google trends data; 2022.
5. of Health D, Department. Care) S. tackling obesity: empowering adults and children to live healthier lives. DHSC Wales; 2020.