Author:
Baquero Barbara,Novak Nicole,Sewell Daniel K.,Kava Christine M.,Daniel-Ulloa Jason,Pham Hanh,Askleson Natoshia,Ashida Sato,Laroche Helena,Maldonado Gonzalez Adriana,Bucklin Rebecca,Haines Heidi,Parker Edith A., ,Diers Lynelle,Hernandez Himar,Hellige Kim,Dunn Brian,Rathje Gene,Gates Claudia,Ross Garrett,Ellingson Rebecca
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Much evidence-based physical activity (PA) interventions have been tested and implemented in urban contexts. However, studies that adapt, implement, and evaluate the effectiveness of these interventions in micropolitan rural contexts are needed. The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Active Ottumwa intervention to promote PA in a micropolitan community.
Methods
Between 2013 – 2019, we implemented Active Ottumwa in a micropolitan setting, and subsequently implemented and evaluated its effectiveness using a Hybrid Type I design. In this paper, we describe the intervention’s effectiveness in promoting PA. We collected PA data over 24 months from a cohort of community residents using accelerometers and PA data from two cross-sectional community surveys administered in 2013 and 2018, using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire.
Results
From the cohort, we found significant change in PA over 24 months (P = 0.03) corresponding to a 45-min daily decrease in sedentary activity, a daily increase of 35-min in light PA and 9 min in moderate-to-vigorous PA. There was a statistically significant (P = 0.01) increasing trend at the population-level in the moderate-to-vigorous composition of 7 min between the two cross-sectional assessments (95% CI: 0.1%—1.34%).
Conclusions
The study demonstrates that the adapted evidence-based PA interventions in a micropolitan context is effective.
Funder
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Centers for Disease Control Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention, Health Promotion Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity. Data, trends and maps. https://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpao/data-trends-maps/index.html. Accessed 2 Dec 2019.
2. Center for Disease Control, National Center for Health Statistics. FastStats – exercise or physical activity. Updated 2019–09–04. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/exercise.htm. Accessed 13 Dec 2019.
3. Blackwell D, Clarke T. State variation in meeting the 2008 federal guidelines for both aerobic and muscle-strengthening activities through leisure-time physical activity among adults aged 18–64: United States, 2010–2015. National Health Statistics Report. 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr112.pdf.
4. Sharpe PA, Jackson KL, White C, et al. Effects of a one-year physical activity intervention for older adults at congregate nutrition sites. Gerontologist. 1997;37(2):208–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/37.2.208.
5. Thorp A, Kingwell B, Sethi P, Hammond L, Owen N, Dunstan D. Alternating bouts of sitting and standing attenuate postprandial glucose responses. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(11):2053–61. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000337.