Abstract
Abstract
Background
Venezuela is in the throes of a complex humanitarian crisis that is one of the worst in decades to impact any country outside of wartime. This case analysis describes the challenges faced by the ongoing Maracaibo Aging Study (MAS) during the deteriorating conditions in Venezuela. When the MAS began in 1997, it focused on memory-related disorders. Since then, strategic planning and proactive community participation allowed us to anticipate and address logistical, funding, and ethical challenges, and facilitated the enrollment and retention of more than 2500 subjects over 55 years of age. All participants, who are residents of the city of Maracaibo, Venezuela, underwent various assessments on several occasions. Here, we discuss how our approach to implementing a longitudinal, population-based study of age-related conditions has allowed our research program to continue throughout this period of political, economic, and social upheaval.
Discussion
As the social context in Venezuela became more complicated, new challenges emerged, and strategies to sustain the study and participation were refined. We identified five main mechanisms through which the evolving humanitarian crisis has affected implementation of the MAS: 1) community dynamics; 2) morale of researchers, staff, and participants; 3) financial feasibility; 4) components of the research process; and 5) impact on the health of staff, participants, and their families. Strategies to compensate for the impact on these components were implemented, based on inputs from community members and staff. Improved communication, greater involvement of stakeholders, broadening the scope of the project, and strengthening international collaboration have been the most useful strategies. Particular demands emerged, related to the increased mortality and comorbidities of participants and staff, and deterioration of basic services and safety.
Conclusion
Although the MAS has faced numerous obstacles, it has been possible to continue a longitudinal research project throughout the humanitarian crisis, because our research team has engaged the community deeply and developed a sense of mutual commitment, and also because our project has provided funding to help keep researchers employed, somewhat attenuating the brain drain.
Funder
U.S Civilian Research & Development Foundation
National Science Foundation
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas de Venezuela
National Institute on Aging and the Fogarty International Center
National Institutes of Health and National Institute on Aging
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference35 articles.
1. Kurmanaev A. Venezuela’s collapse is the worst outside of war in decades. Economists Say The New York Times. 2019;17:2019.
2. Rendon M, Schneider ML. Venezuela’s Crisis Is Now a Regional Humanitarian Disaster: CSIS Center for Strategic & International Studies; 2018 [Available from: https://www.csis.org/analysis/venezuelas-crisis-now-regional-humanitarian-disaster.
3. UN. United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights - Human Rights Council: Human rights in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. United Nations; 2019 05 July 2019. Contract No.: A/HRC/41/18.
4. Platform RI-AC. Regional Inter-Agency Coordination Platform: Refugees and Migrants from Venezuela 2019 [Available from: https://r4v.info/en/situations/platform.
5. HRW. Human Rights Watch: World Report 2019 - Events of 2018. United States of America: Seven Stories Press; 2019.