Author:
Eslami Jahromi Maryam,Ayatollahi Haleh,Ebrazeh Ali
Abstract
Abstract
Background
During the Covid-19 pandemic, a number of hotlines/helplines/call centers was implemented to provide remote services and support public health. The objective of this study was to investigate the characteristics, challenges and lessons learned of implementing Covid-19 hotlines/helplines/call centers during the pandemic.
Methods
PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, IEEE Xplore, and ProQuest databases as well as Google Scholar were searched between 1st January 2020 and 31st December 2023 to retrieve relevant articles published in English. The quality and risk of bias of the studies were assessed using the Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS), the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), and Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Checklist.
Results
In total, 43 out of 1440 articles were included in this study. About half of the hotlines/helplines/call centers were launched in March 2020 (n = 19). Providing psychological support (n = 23), reliable information about Covid-19 (n = 10), healthcare advices about Covid-19 (n = 8), and triage (n = 7) were the most common purposes of implementing these services. The most common challenges included a lack of physical examination, unavailability of hotlines/helplines/call centers at the point of need, and delay in updating Covid-19 information. The most common lessons learned were employing qualified staff, providing proper training, and getting feedback from the callers and operators.
Conclusion
According to the results, most of the Covid-19 hotlines/helplines/call centers were launched in the early months of the pandemic, and about half of them were active seven days a week. Most of the operators were mental health providers and clinicians. The findings show the importance of continuous psychological support during crises, particularly when adequate information about the situation is not available. The challenges experienced by the callers and operators as well as the lessons learned by the service providers also need to be considered for future crises to increase the effectiveness of similar services.
Funder
Iran University of Medical Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference93 articles.
1. National Academies of Sciences E, Medicine, Health, Medicine D, Board on Population H, Public Health P, et al. In: Downey A, Brown L, Calonge N, editors. Evidence-based practice for public health emergency preparedness and response. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2020.
2. Elkbuli A, Herrera M, Awan M, Elassad C. Striving towards an effective emergency preparedness and disaster management response: lessons learned and future directions. Am J Emerg Med. 2021;50:804–5.
3. Blackstock SC, Moody-Williams JD, Fleisher LA. Learnings regarding emergency preparedness during the Public Health emergency: a mixed-methods study of hospitals and long-term care facilities. NEJM Catalyst. 2022;3(4):1–12.
4. Maddock J, Hayes D, St John TL, Rajan R, Park SY. Public health hotline: if disaster struck, would you be ready to respond? Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2012;71(9):266–9.
5. Wang J, Wei H, Zhou L. Hotline services in China during Covid-19 pandemic. J Affect Disord. 2020;275:125–6.