Author:
Janmohamed Kamila,Nakamura-Sakai Shinpei,Soale Abdul-Nasah,Forastiere Laura,Altice Frederick L.,Kumar Navin
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
News coverage around vaping-related events may have furthered misconceptions regarding the relative harms of vapes. Such information may influence the decisions of individuals who smoke, around switching to vaping, potentially affecting the overall tobacco mortality burden. Thus, it is prudent to study how news events (e.g., 2019 vaping illness epidemic) are associated with vape sales in the United States, to possibly reduce the tobacco mortality burden.
Methods
We used weekly retail sales data for e-cigarettes (30 December 2018 - 28 December 2019) from the US retail scanner data compiled by the Nielsen Company. We used an interrupted time series design with segmented regression analysis to determine immediate and longer-term impacts of individual news events (e.g. Trump administration’s planned ban on some flavored vaping products) on vape sales, controlling for pre-existing trends.
Results
Unexpectedly, we noted a statistically significant positive relationship between vape sales and the CDC announcing an investigation into vaping-related illnesses (Change: 6.59%, Estimate: 0.066; 95% CI: 0.036, 0.092; P < 0.001). We also observed a similar positive association between vape sales and the CDC’s announcement on the link between Vitamin E acetate and EVALI (Change: 2.93%, Estimate: 0.029; 95% CI: 0.003, 0.055; P < 0.05). There was a steep decline in sales after these events.
Conclusions
News events may be associated with US vape sales. Findings have implications for the management of risk perceptions around vaping to improve health outcomes of tobacco users. Information-based policy instruments can be applied to balance the effects of news events that may influence vape sales.
Funder
Foundation for a Smoke-Free World
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference43 articles.
1. McNeill A, Brose LS, Calder R, Bauld L, Robson D. Evidence review of e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products 2018. A report commissioned by Public Health England. Lond: Public Health England. 2018; 6.
2. Zettler PJ, Hemmerich N, Berman ML. Closing the regulatory gap for synthetic nicotine products. Boston College law review. Boston College. Law School. 2018; 59(6):1933.
3. Nyman AL, Huang J, Weaver SR, Eriksen MP. Perceived comparative harm of cigarettes and electronic nicotine delivery systems. JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2(11):1915680.
4. Tattan-Birch H, Brown J, Shahab L, Jackson SE. Association of the us outbreak of vaping-associated lung injury with perceived harm of e-cigarettes compared with cigarettes. JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3(6). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6981.
5. Polosa R, Morjaria JB, Caponnetto P, Prosperini U, Russo C, Pennisi A, Bruno CM. Evidence for harm reduction in copd smokers who switch to electronic cigarettes. Respir Res. 2016; 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-016-0481-x.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献