Abstract
Abstract
Background
The home provides the physical and social context for the majority of eating behaviors for U.S. adults. This study describes eleven dimensions of the home food environment among a national sample of U.S. adults and identifies which are associated with diet quality and overweight/obesity.
Methods
A national sample of U.S. adults ages 18 to 75 was recruited from an online survey panel. Respondents (n = 4942) reported on foods available in the home, including 1) fruit and vegetables, 2) salty snacks/sweets, 3) less healthy beverages, as well as 4) food placement, 5) shopping practices for fruits and vegetables, 6) food preparation, 7) portion control methods, 8) family meals from restaurants, 9) family household practices around TV and eating, 10) presence of a TV in the dining area, and 11) ownership of a scale. Self-reported height and weight, fruit and vegetable intake, and percent calories from fat were also assessed.
Results
Mean household size was 2.6, 32.7% had children in the home, and 23.1% lived alone. The majority were White (67.7%), with 12.3% Black and 14.3% Hispanic. Mean age was 44.4 and 48.3% were men. In multivariable models, seven features of the home food environment were associated with meeting the recommended fruit and vegetable intake guidelines, with food placement, meal preparation, frequency of shopping for fruit, and a greater variety of fruits and vegetables available in the home most strongly associated. Eight of 11 features were associated with percent energy from fat, including restaurant food for family meals, salty snacks and sweets availability, less healthy beverages availability, food placement, meal preparation, frequency of shopping for fruit, family eating with the TV on, and having a TV in the dining area. More diverse fruit and vegetable availability was associated with lower odds of overweight/obesity, and more frequent family eating while watching TV was associated with increased odds of overweight/obesity.
Conclusion
Targeting these dimensions of the home food environment may be a promising approach for future intervention research.
Funder
Rollins School of Public Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference52 articles.
1. United States Department of Agriculture. Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2020-2025. Washington DC: United States Department of Agriculture. Available from: https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov. Accessed 15 Mar 2021.
2. Lin B-H, Guthrie J. Nutritional quality of food prepared at home and away from home, 1977-2008. Washington D.C: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service; 2012.
3. Bruening M, McClain D, Moramarco M, Reifsnider E. The role of SNAP in home food availability and dietary intake among WIC participants facing unstable housing. Public Health Nurs. 2017;34(3):219–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12311.
4. Quick V, Martin-Biggers J, Povis GA, Hongu N, Worobey J, Byrd-Bredbenner C. A socio-ecological examination of weight-related characteristics of the home environment and lifestyles of households with young children. Nutrients. 2017;9(6):604. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9060604.
5. Grant E, Gearry R, Wilson R, Pearson J, Skidmore P. Home availability of fruit and vegetables and obesogenic foods as an indicator of nutrient intake in 50 year olds from Canterbury, New Zealand. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2017;26(3):524–30. https://doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.042016.11.