Author:
Dąbek Józefa,Sierka Oskar,Gąsior Zbigniew
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Protective vaccinations are one of the basic means of infectious disease prevention. The aim of the study was to assess the implementation of compulsory and additional protective vaccinations among adult Poles, their knowledge about the purpose of introducing a vaccination schedule and adverse events following immunization. Opinions about and support for anti-vaccination movements were also examined.
Materials and methods
A total of 700 (100%) people aged 18 to 80 (x̅ = 32,16 ± 16,46) took part in the study, conducted using the proprietary questionnaire. All the participants selected randomly from patients of the Department of Cardiology, their visitors, doctors, nurses, paramedics, medical students, and authors’ acquaintances gave their informed consent to participate in the study.
Results
About 10% of the respondents did not complete the compulsory vaccination schedule. Almost 80% of respondents believed that the main reason for vaccinations schedule occurrence was the desire to completely exclude certain diseases and their complications from the population. More than half of the respondents have never had any additional vaccination. A statistically significant correlation was found between intake of at least one additional vaccination and age (χ2=22.262, p = 0.002) and education level (χ2= 11.074, p = 0.004). Among the respondents, there was a group that classified autism as one of the adverse events following immunization. About 95% of respondents never experienced any adverse events following immunizationand as many as 30 respondents declared their support for anti-vaccination movements.
Conclusion
The degree of the implementation of compulsory protective vaccinations in the study group was high, while additional vaccinations were insufficient. The purposefulness of introducing a vaccination schedule was correctly identified by the majority of the respondents, but the knowledge about adverse events following immunisation and their types was incomplete. Among participants were individuals who declared their support for anti-vaccination movements, so society should be constantly educated about vaccinations benefits.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference23 articles.
1. Stern A, Markel H. The history of vaccines and immunization: familiar patterns, new challenges. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(3):611–21. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.24.3.611.
2. Greenwood B. The contribution of vaccination to global health: past, present, and future. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014;369(1645):20130433. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0433.
3. Kraśnicka J, Krajewska-Kułak E, Klimaszewska K, et al. Mandatory and recommended vaccinations in Poland in the views of parents. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018;14(12):2884–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2018.1496766.
4. Koperny M, Bała M, Bandoła K, et al. Analysis of adverse events following immunisation in Poland between 2003–2012. Problemy Higieny i Epidemiologii. 2014;95(3):609–15.
5. Rozporządzenie Ministra Zdrowia z dnia 21 grudnia 2010 r. w sprawie niepożądanych odczynów poszczepiennych oraz kryteriów ich rozpoznawania Dz.U.10.254.1711 wydane na podstawie art. 21 ust. 8 ustawy z dnia 5 grudnia 2008 r. o zapobieganiu oraz zwalczaniu zakażeń I chorób zakaźnych u ludzi Dz. U. Nr 234, poz. 1570, z 2009 r. Nr 76, poz. 641 oraz z 2010 r. Nr 107, poz. 679
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献