Learning how relationships work: a thematic analysis of young people and relationship professionals’ perspectives on relationships and relationship education

Author:

Benham-Clarke SimonORCID,Ewing JanORCID,Barlow AnneORCID,Newlove-Delgado TamsinORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background Relationships in various forms are an important source of meaning in people’s lives that can benefit their health, wellbeing and happiness. Relationship distress is associated with public health problems such as alcohol misuse, obesity, poor mental health, and child poverty, whilst safe, stable, and nurturing relationships are potential protective factors. Despite increased emphasis on Relationship Education in schools, little is known about the views of relationship professionals on relationship education specifically, and how this contrasts with the views of young people (YP). This Wellcome Centre for the Cultures and Environments of Health funded Beacon project seeks to fill this gap by exploring their perspectives and inform the future development of relationship education. Methods We conducted focus groups with YP (n = 4) and interviews with relationship professionals (n = 10). The data was then thematically analysed. Results Themes from YP focus groups included: ‘Good and bad relationships’; ‘Learning about relationships’; ‘the role of schools’ and ‘Beyond Relationship Education’. Themes from interviews with relationship professionals included: ‘essential qualities of healthy relationships’; ‘how YP learn to relate’ and ‘the role of Relationship Education in schools’. Conclusions YP and relationship professionals recognised the importance of building YP’s relational capability in schools with a healthy relationship with oneself at its foundation. Relationship professionals emphasised the need for a developmental approach, stressing the need for flexibility, adaptability, commitment and resilience to maintain relationships over the life course. YP often presented dichotomous views, such as relationships being either good or bad relationships, and perceived a link between relationships and mental health. Although not the focus of current curriculum guidance, managing relationship breakdowns and relationship transitions through the life course were viewed as important with an emphasis on building relational skills. This research suggests that schools need improved Relationship Education support, including specialist expertise and resources, and guidance on signposting YP to external sources of help. There is also potential for positive relationship behaviours being modelled and integrated throughout curriculums and reflected in a school’s ethos. Future research should explore co-development, evaluation and implementation of Relationship Education programmes with a range of stakeholders.

Funder

Wellcome Centre for the Cultures and Environments of Health

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference40 articles.

1. Schankweiler DA. What do we mean when we talk about meaning? A qualitative study on students’ concepts and sources of meaning in life (Bachelor's thesis, University of Twente). 2020. http://essay.utwente.nl/82037/1/Schankweiler_BA_BMS.pdf. Accessed 21 Nov 2021.

2. Sserwanja I, Marjoribanks D. Relationship Distress Monitor Estimating levels of adult couple relationship distress across the UK. Relate. 2016;3. https://www.relate.org.uk/sites/default/files/relationship_distress_monitor_0.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2022.

3. Braithwaite S, Holt-Lunstad J. Romantic relationships and mental health. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017;13:120–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.001.

4. Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Wilson SJ. Lovesick: how couples’ relationships influence health. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2017;8(13):421–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045111.

5. Robles TF, Slatcher RB, Trombello JM, McGinn MM. Marital quality and health: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Bull. 2014;140(1):140. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031859.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3