Abstract
Abstract
Background
Australian age-standardized incidence and death rates for liver cancer are lower than world averages, but increasing as in other economically advanced western countries. World Health Organization emphasizes the need to address sociodemographic disparities in cancer risk. A more detailed sociodemographic risk profiling was undertaken for liver cancer in New South Wales (NSW) by diagnostic stage, than possible with NSW Cancer Registry (NSWCR) alone, by incorporating linked data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). The purpose was to inform targeting and monitoring of cancer services.
Methods
The ABS manages the Multi-Agency Data Integration Project (MADIP) which includes a wide range of health, educational, welfare, census, and employment data. These data were linked at person level to NSWCR liver cancer registrations for the period post 2016 census to December 2018. De-identified data were analyzed. Sex-specific age-adjusted odds ratios (95%CIs) of liver cancer were derived using logistic regression by age, country of birth, residential remoteness, proficiency in spoken English, household income, employment status, occupation type, educational attainment, sole person household, joblessness, socioeconomic status, disability status, multimorbidity, and other health-related factors, including GP consultations. These data complement the less detailed sociodemographic data available from the NSWCR, with alignment of numerators and population denominators for accurate risk assessment.
Results
Results indicate liver cancer disproportionately affects population members already experiencing excess social and health disadvantage. Examples where 95% confidence intervals of odds ratios of liver cancer were elevated included having poor English-speaking proficiency, limited education, housing authority tenancy, living in sole-person households, having disabilities, multiple medicated conditions, and being carers of people with a disability. Also, odds of liver cancer were higher in more remote regions outside major cities, and in males, with higher odds of more advanced cancer stages (degrees of spread) at diagnosis in more remote regions.
Conclusions
Linked data enabled more detailed risk profiling than previously possible. This will support the targeting of cancer services and benchmarking.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference26 articles.
1. Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, et al. International Agency for Research on Cancer, World health orgnization. Global Cancer Observatory, Cancer today. Lyon: IARC; 2020. https://gco.iarc.fr.
2. Arnold M, Abnet CC, Neale RE, Vignat J, Giovannucci EL, McGlynn KA, Bray F. Global burden of 5 types of gastrointestinal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2020;159(1):335–349el5.
3. Australian Government, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer data in Australia. Canberra: AIHW; 2022. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/cancer/cancer-data-in-australia/contents/about.
4. Australian Government, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Cancer in Australia. Volume Cancer series no 133 Cat no CAN144. Canberra: AIHW; 2021.
5. Cancer Council Victoria. (2022) Liver cancer statistics and trends. Melbourne: Cancer Council Victoria. https://www.cancervic.org.au/research/vcr/cancer-fact-sheets/liver-cancer.html.