Tenant perspectives on the implementation of the community homes for opportunity: a focused ethnographic study in Southwestern Ontario

Author:

Forchuk Cheryl,Gyamfi Sebastian,Hassan Heba,Lucyk Bryanna,Booth Richard

Abstract

Abstract Background Recovery-oriented programs provide individuals with opportunities for well-being through community integration processes that enhance the degree to which individuals could live, work, and recreate in their community. The current evaluation assessed how tenants experience their home environment after the modernization of Homes for Special Care (HSC) to Community Homes for Opportunity (CHO) in Southwest Ontario, Canada. Our study identifies existing policies and practices that could interfere with or promote the modernization process. Methods We applied ethnographic qualitative techniques to purposefully recruit 188 participants with severe mental illness from 28 group homes. Focus groups were conducted at three time points, i.e., at pre-implementation/Baseline/Time I – spring 2018; Transition/Time II – fall 2018, and Final/Time III – winter 2019. Results Study findings suggest that the transition of HSC to CHO supports activities that empower tenants towards personal growth and development. Participants were largely satisfied with the support they were getting in relation to the program-related services. Tenants disclosed that their quality of life and well-being had been enhanced through participating in the program, and that their social interaction and support for each other had also improved. Most tenants demonstrated autonomy in terms of personal and financial independence. The enhanced financial support for tenants did not only improve their quality of life, but also helped to raise their purchasing power, decision making, sense of responsibility and accountability towards healthy spending of their resources. Despite tenants’ good impression about the CHO, some still encountered problems and provided suggestions to further improve the program. Conclusion It is expected that a more effective and expanded CHO will lead to tenant empowerment and successful social integration.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference28 articles.

1. Bejerholm U, Roe D. Personal recovery within positive psychiatry.Nordic Journal of Psychiatry. 2018 Aug72(6):420–30.

2. Carling PJ. Return to community: building support systems for people with psychiatric disabilities. Guilford Press; 1995.

3. Chan DV. Safe spaces, Agency, and connections to “Regular Stuff”: what makes permanent supportive housing feel like “Home”. Rehabilitation Counselling Bulletin. 2020 Jan;63(2):102–14.

4. Cruz EV, Higginbottom G. The use of focused ethnography in nursing research.Nurse researcher. 2013 Mar 20(4).

5. Dohler E, Bailey P, Rice D, Katch H. Supportive housing helps vulnerable people live and thrive in the community.Center on Budget and Policy Priorities: Policy Futures. 2016 May,31.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3