Author:
Islam Md Irteja,Chadwick Verity,Martiniuk Alexandra
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Testing has played a crucial role in reducing the spread of COVID-19. Though COVID-19 symptoms tend to be less severe in adolescents and young adults, their highly social lifestyles can lead to increased transmission of the virus. In this study, we aimed to provide population-based estimates of polymerase chain reaction testing (PCR) for the COVID-19 pandemic and identify factors associated with PCR testing in Australian youth using the latest survey data from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC).
Methods
We used the latest wave (9C1) of the LSAC, collected from 16 to 21-year-old Australians via an online survey between October and December 2020. In total, 2291 youths responded to the questions about COVID-19 testing including factors related to the coronavirus restriction period (CRP) in Australia. Both bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify variables (sociodemographic factors and factors related to CRP) associated with COVID-19 testing.
Results
During the study period, 26% (n = 587) of Australian youth aged between 16 and 21 years were tested for COVID-19. The strongest predictor of COVID-19 testing was living in major cities (aOR 1.82, 95% CI:1.34–2.45; p < 0.01). Increased age (aOR 1.97, 1.00–3.89; p < 0.05) and having a pre-existing medical condition (aOR 1.27, 1.02–1.59; p < 0.05) were also significantly associated with a higher likelihood of COVID-19 testing.
Conclusion
Age, remoteness and having a pre-existing medical illness were associated with PCR COVID-19 testing among Australian youth aged between 16 and 21 years in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. More research is warranted to identify factors associated with other COVID-19 testing methods and address the specific barriers that may limit COVID-19 testing in this age group.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference69 articles.
1. Ashcroft P, Lehtinen S, Bonhoeffer S. Test-trace-isolate-quarantine (TTIQ) intervention strategies after symptomatic COVID-19 case identification. PloS one. 2022;17(2):e0263597. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263597.
2. Bielecki M, Patel D, Hinkelbein J, Komorowski M, Kester J, Ebrahim S, et al. Reprint of: air travel and COVID-19 prevention in the pandemic and peri-pandemic period: A narrative review. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2020;38:101939.
3. Maguire K. Rapid antigen COVID tests a welcome relief for interstate truck drivers, but cost remains unclear. ABC New England. 2021. Available at https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-09-29/rapid-antigen-covid-test-approval-welcomed-by-truckies/100496990. Accessed 28 Feb 2022.
4. Thunström L, Ashworth M, Shogren JF, Newbold S, Finnoff D. Testing for COVID-19: willful ignorance or selfless behavior? Behav Public Policy. 2021;5(2):135–52.
5. Perry BL, Aronson B, Railey AF, Ludema C. If you build it, will they come? Social, economic, and psychological determinants of COVID-19 testing decisions. PLoS One. 2021;16(7):e0252658.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献