Author:
Yang Shan-lan,Wu Lei,Huang He-lang,Zhang Lang-lang,Chen Yi-xin,Zhou Sheng,Chen Xiu-xiu,Wang Jiao-feng,Zhang Chao-bao,Bao Zhi-jun
Abstract
Abstract
Background
To analyse the association among the simultaneous effects of dietary intake, daily life behavioural factors, and frailty outcomes in older Chinese women, we predicted the probability of maintaining physical robustness under a combination of different variables.
Methods
The Fried frailty criterion was used to determine the three groups of “frailty”, “pre-frailty”, and “robust”, and a national epidemiological survey was performed. The three-classification decision tree model was fitted, and the comprehensive performance of the model was evaluated to predict the probability of occurrence of different outcomes.
Results
Among the 1,044 participants, 15.9% were frailty and 50.29% were pre-frailty; the overall prevalence first increased and then decreased with age, reaching a peak at 70–74 years of age. Through univariate analysis, filtering, and embedded screening, eight significant variables were identified: staple food, spices, exercise (frequency, intensity, and time), work frequency, self-feeling, and family emotions. In the three-classification decision tree, the values of each evaluation index of Model 3 were relatively average; the accuracy, recall, specificity, precision, and F1 score range were between 75% and 84%, and the AUC was also greater than 0.800, indicating excellent performance and the best interpretability of the results. Model 3 takes exercise time as the root node and contains 6 variables and 10 types, suggesting the impact of the comprehensive effect of these variables on robust and non-robust populations (the predicted probability range is 6.67–93.33%).
Conclusion
The combined effect of these factors (no exercise or less than 0.5 h of exercise per day, occasional exercise, exercise at low intensity, feeling more tired at work, and eating too many staple foods (> 450 g per day) are more detrimental to maintaining robustness.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference27 articles.
1. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, et al. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet (London England). 2013;381(9868):752–62.
2. Hoogendijk EO, Afilalo J, Ensrud KE, et al. Frailty: implications for clinical practice and public health. Lancet (London England). 2019;394(10206):1365–75.
3. Kojima G, Iliffe S, Jivraj S, et al. Association between frailty and quality of life among community-dwelling older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2016;70(7):716–21.
4. Ji XY, Chen J, Bao ZJ. Focusing on the prevention and treatment of frailty among the elderly population in China. Lao Nian Yi Xue Yu bao jian. 2019;25(04):430–2.
5. Tian P, Yang N, Hao QK, et al. Systematic evaluation of the prevalence of elderly frailty in China. Zhong Guo Xun Zheng Yi xue. 2019;19(06):656–64.