Aspect-based classification of vaccine misinformation: a spatiotemporal analysis using Twitter chatter

Author:

Ismail HebaORCID,Hussein Nada,Elabyad Rawan,Abdelhalim Salma,Elhadef MouradORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background The spread of misinformation of all types threatens people’s safety and interrupts resolutions. COVID-19 vaccination has been a widely discussed topic on social media platforms with numerous misleading and fallacious information. This false information has a critical impact on the safety of society as it prevents many people from taking the vaccine, decelerating the world’s ability to go back to normal. Therefore, it is vital to analyze the content shared on social media platforms, detect misinformation, identify aspects of misinformation, and efficiently represent related statistics to combat the spread of misleading information about the vaccine. This paper aims to support stakeholders in decision-making by providing solid and current insights into the spatiotemporal progression of the common misinformation aspects of the various available vaccines. Methods Approximately 3800 tweets were annotated into four expert-verified aspects of vaccine misinformation obtained from reliable medical resources. Next, an Aspect-based Misinformation Analysis Framework was designed using the Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model, which is one of the most advanced, fast, and efficient machine learning models to date. Based on this dataset, spatiotemporal statistical analysis was performed to infer insights into the progression of aspects of vaccine misinformation among the public. Finally, the Pearson correlation coefficient and p-values are calculated for the global misinformation count against the vaccination counts of 43 countries from December 2020 until July 2021. Results The optimized classification per class (i.e., per an aspect of misinformation) accuracy was 87.4%, 92.7%, 80.1%, and 82.5% for the “Vaccine Constituent,” “Adverse Effects,” “Agenda,” “Efficacy and Clinical Trials” aspects, respectively. The model achieved an Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) of 90.3% and 89.6% for validation and testing, respectively, which indicates the reliability of the proposed framework in detecting aspects of vaccine misinformation on Twitter. The correlation analysis shows that 37% of the countries addressed in this study were negatively affected by the spread of misinformation on Twitter resulting in reduced number of administered vaccines during the same timeframe. Conclusions Twitter is a rich source of insight on the progression of vaccine misinformation among the public. Machine Learning models, such as LightGBM, are efficient for multi-class classification and proved reliable in classifying vaccine misinformation aspects even with limited samples in social media datasets.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference28 articles.

1. Vaccination Rates, Approvals & Trials by Country – COVID19 Vaccine Tracker [Internet]. Available from: https://covid19.trackvaccines.org/trials-vaccines-by-country/. Cited 28 Mar 2022.

2. Marsh S. The history of Covid vaccine development | Coronavirus | The Guardian [Internet]. 2021. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/dec/08/the-history-of-covid-vaccine-development.

3. COVID-19 vaccinations vs. COVID-19 deaths, Dec 1, 2020 to Jul 1, 2021 [Internet]. Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/covid-vaccinations-vs-covid-death-rate?tab=table&time=2020-12-01..2021-07-01&country=FRA~DEU~ITA~GBR~USA~CAN~JPN~BRA~AUS~ZAF. Cited 28 Mar 2022.

4. Taylor CA, Whitaker M, Anglin O, Milucky J, Patel K, Pham H, et al. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report COVID-19-Associated Hospitalizations Among Adults During SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron Variant Predominance, by Race/Ethnicity and Vaccination Status-COVID-NET, 14 States. 2022; Available from: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.27.21262356v1. Cited 20 May 2022.

5. COVID Vax Opponents and Rigid Proponents...Are Both Anti-Science? | MedPage Today [Internet]. Available from: https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19vaccine/92413. Cited 28 Mar 2022.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Comparative analysis of Deep Learning and Machine Learning algorithms for emoji prediction from Arabic text;Social Network Analysis and Mining;2024-03-25

2. Twitter (X) in Medicine: Friend or Foe to the Field of Interventional Cardiology?;Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions;2023-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3