Abstract
Abstract
Background
Climate change is a major public health issue worldwide. To achieve climate targets and reduce morbidity, a paradigm shift in individual behavior e.g., in mobility, is needed. Municipal interventions can motivate individuals to engage in climate-friendly behavior through different psychological mechanisms. In order for successful interventions, it is necessary to gain better insight from study participants and their reasons for participating in mobility projects (e.g., motivational aspects).
Materials and methods
A mixed-methods design was used to evaluate reasons and characteristics of people for participating in an municipal mobility intervention. The quantitative sub-study assesses socioeconomic characteristics, environmental awareness and perceived stress. The qualitative sub-study explores motivation for participation and change, perspectives on car replacement and reasons for car use.
Results
Results show that participants (n = 42) are rather high educated and show medium environmental awareness. Participants of the qualitative study part (n = 15) were motiviated to reduce car use already before the intervention and used the intervention as starting point or trial phase.
Conclusions
Urban intervention projects with fitted recruitment strategies and better insights from study participants with the aim to motivate individuals to engage in climate-friendly behavior can help to strengthen sustainability and public health.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference61 articles.
1. IPCC. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability; 2022.
2. Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen (WBGU). Planetare Gesundheit: Worüber wir jetzt reden müssen. Berlin: Wissenschaftlicher Beirat d. Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen; 2021.
3. Kahlenborn W, Porst L, Voß M, Fritsch U, Renner K, Zebisch M, et al. Klimawirkungs- Und Risikoanalyse 2021 für Deutschland. 26th ed. Dessau-Roßlau; 2021.
4. Wynes S, Nicholas KA. The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions. Environ Res Lett. 2017;12:74024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa7541.
5. Blitz A, Busch-Geertsema A, Lanzendorf M. More Cycling, Less Driving? Findings of a Cycle Street intervention study in the Rhine-Main Metropolitan Region, Germany. Sustainability. 2020;12:805. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030805.