Author:
Quintiliani Lisa M.,Dedier Julien,Amezquita Marislena,Sierra-Ruiz Melibea,Romero Dariela,Murillo Jennifer,Mahar Sarah,Goodman Melody,Kane John B.,Cummings Doreen,Woolley Timothy G.,Spinola Iolando,Crouter Scott E.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Physical activity behavioral interventions to change individual-level drivers of activity, like motivation, attitudes, and self-efficacy, are often not sustained beyond the intervention period. Interventions at both environmental and individual levels might facilitate durable change. This community-based study seeks to test a multilevel, multicomponent intervention to increase moderate intensity physical activity among people with low incomes living in U.S. public housing developments, over a 2 year period.
Methods
The study design is a prospective, cluster randomized controlled trial, with housing developments (n=12) as the units of randomization. In a four-group, factorial trial, we will compare an environmental intervention (E) alone (3 developments), an individual intervention (I) alone (3 developments), an environmental plus individual (E+I) intervention (3 developments), against an assessment only control group (3 developments). The environmental only intervention consists of community health workers leading walking groups and indoor activities, a walking advocacy program for residents, and provision of walking maps/signage. The individual only intervention consists of a 12-week automated telephone program to increase physical activity motivation and self-efficacy. All residents are invited to participate in the intervention activities being delivered at their development. The primary outcome is change in moderate intensity physical activity measured via an accelerometer-based device among an evaluation cohort (n=50 individuals at each of the 12 developments) from baseline to 24-month follow up. Mediation (e.g., neighborhood walkability, motivation) and moderation (e.g., neighborhood stress) of our interventions will be assessed. Lastly, we will interview key informants to assess factors from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains to inform future implementation.
Discussion
We hypothesize participants living in developments in any of the three intervention groups (E only, I only, and E+I combined) will increase minutes of moderate intensity physical activity more than participants in control group developments. We expect delivery of an intervention package targeting environmental and social factors to become active, combined with the individual level intervention, will improve overall physical activity levels to recommended guidelines at the development level. If effective, this trial has the potential for implementation through other federal and state housing authorities.
Trial registration
Clinical Trails.gov PRS Protocol Registration and Results System, NCT05147298. Registered 28 November 2021.
Funder
NIH/National Institute on Minority Health & Health Disparities
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference78 articles.
1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention M. Prevalence of regular physical activity among adults – United States, 2001 and 2005. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2007;56(46):1209–12.
2. Sun F, Norman IJ, While AE. Physical activity in older people: A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:449.
3. Frieden T, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC Health Disparities and Inequalities Report - United States 2013. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62(3):1–2.
4. Bellavia A, Bottai M, Wolk A, Orsini N. Physical activity and mortality in a prospective cohort of middle-aged and elderly men - a time perspective. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10:94.
5. Kibbe DL, Hackett J, Hurley M, McFarland A, Schubert KG, Schultz A, et al. Ten Years of TAKE 10!(®): Integrating physical activity with academic concepts in elementary school classrooms. Prev Med. 2011;52(Suppl 1):S43-50.