Author:
Timp Sheila,van Foreest Nicky,Roelen Corné
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Sickness absence is a major public health problem, given its high cost and negative impact on employee well-being. Understanding sickness absence duration and recovery rates among different groups is useful to develop effective strategies for enhancing recovery and reducing costs related to sickness absence.
Methods
Our study analyzed data from a large occupational health service, including over 5 million sick-listed employees from 2010 to 2020, out of which almost 600,000 cases were diagnosed by an occupational health physician. We classified each case according to diagnosis and gender, and performed descriptive statistical analysis for each category. In addition, we used survival analysis to determine recovery rates for each group.
Results
Mean sickness duration and recovery rate both differ significantly among groups. Mental and musculoskeletal disorders had the longest absence duration. Recovery rates differed especially during the first months of sickness absence. For men the recovery rate was nearly constant during the first 1.5 year, for women the recovery rate was relatively low in the first three months, and then stayed nearly constant for 1.5 year.
Conclusion
Across almost all diagnostic classes, it was consistently observed that women had longer average sickness absence durations than to men. Considering mental disorders and diseases of the musculoskeletal system, women had relatively lower recovery rates during the initial months compared to men. As time progressed, the recovery rates of both genders converged and became more similar.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference33 articles.
1. Greasley P, Greasley K. Absence from work. Technical report, Eurofound. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/publications/report/2010/absence-from-work.
2. Wolvetang S, van Dongen JM, Speklé E, Coenen P, Schaafsma F. Sick Leave Due to Stress, What are the Costs for Dutch Employers? J Occup Rehabil. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-022-10042-x.
3. Ross CE, Mirowsky J. Does Employment Affect Health? J Health Soc Behav. 1995;36:230–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137340.
4. Venema A, Hooftman W, Fijan D, Swart C, Jansse E. Arbobalans 2020: Kwaliteit van de arbeid, effecten en maatregelen in Nederland. TNO: Technical report; 2020.
5. Roelen CAM, Koopmans PC, Anema JR, Beek AJVD. Recurrence of medically certified sickness absence according to diagnosis: a sickness absence register study. J Occup Rehabil. 20:113–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-009-9226-8.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献