Author:
Perri Melissa,O’Campo Patricia,Gill Paneet,Gunn Virginia,Ma Rachel W,Buhariwala Pearl,Rasoulian Elham,Lewchuk Wayne,Baron Sherry,Bodin Theo,Muntaner Carles
Abstract
AbstractPrecarious employment (PE) is non-standard employment with uncertain and unstable contract duration, low wages, and limited labour protections and rights. Research has associated PE with workers’ poor mental health and well-being; however, this association has been studied primarily using quantitative methods. This qualitative study seeks to examine the mechanisms between PE and mental health in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada. Specifically, it aims to address: (Benach J, Muntaner C. Precarious employment and health: developing a research agenda. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61(4):276.) How do PE and working conditions impact the mental well-being of workers and members of their close families or households?; and (Kreshpaj B, Orellana C, Burström B, Davis L, Hemmingsson T, Johansson G, et al. What is precarious employment? A systematic review of definitions and operationalizations from quantitative and qualitative studies. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2020;46(3):235–47.) How has the COVID-19 pandemic shaped these relationships? Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a sample of 40 individuals aged 25–55 engaged in PE during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic or whose employment was terminated due to the pandemic. Results showed that PE amplified mental health symptoms and illnesses for workers and their families. These experiences were described as chronic, where impacts were exerted on precariously employed workers through systemic discrimination and racism, colonialism, workplace hierarchies, and gendered ideologies. PE negatively impacted mental health through emotional stress about employment and income instability, insecurity, and loss; added pressure for households where both partners are engaged in PE; impacted ability to maintain or improve overall health and well-being; and barriers to social connectedness. Overall, this study characterizes multiple dimensions of PE and the consequences they have on the mental health of workers and their families.
Funder
Fotre: Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference33 articles.
1. Benach J, Muntaner C. Precarious employment and health: developing a research agenda. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61(4):276.
2. Kreshpaj B, Orellana C, Burström B, Davis L, Hemmingsson T, Johansson G, et al. What is precarious employment? A systematic review of definitions and operationalizations from quantitative and qualitative studies. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2020;46(3):235–47.
3. International Labour Organization. ACTRAV Symposium on Precarious Work (4–7. October, 2011) [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2023 Jul 16]. http://www.ilo.org/actrav/events/WCMS_153972/lang--en/index.htm.
4. Benach J, Vives A, Amable M, Vanroelen C, Tarafa G, Muntaner C. Precarious employment: understanding an emerging Social Determinant of Health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35(1):229–53.
5. Canadian Union of Public Employees. Canadian Union of Public Employees. 2018 [cited 2023 Jul 16]. Precarious work on the rise. https://cupe.ca/precarious-work-rise.