Abstract
Abstract
Background
Loneliness can have a detrimental impact on health, yet little is known about the association between disability and loneliness.
Methods
Secondary analysis of three waves of data collected between 2017 and 2020 by the UK’s annual household panel study, Understanding Society. Direct age-standardisation was used to compare the prevalence of loneliness at each wave and the persistence of loneliness across all three waves for participants with/without disabilities aged 16–65 years. Transitional probabilities for the stability of loneliness, the stability of non-loneliness, the onset of loneliness and the offset of loneliness between consecutive waves were also estimated.
Results
At each wave, the prevalence of loneliness was significantly higher among respondents with disabilities than respondents without disabilities; these inequalities persisted with no evidence of change over time. The prevalence of persistent loneliness was 46% for respondents with disabilities compared with 22% for respondents without disabilities. Risk factors for the likelihood of persistent loneliness included disability, financial stress, not living as a couple, living in rented accommodation, being female and not being employed. The probability of the onset and stability of loneliness between successive waves were markedly higher for people with disabilities compared with people without disabilities.
Conclusion
Adults with disabilities were more likely to experience loneliness, become lonely and remain lonely over time than their peers. Policies and interventions aimed at reducing loneliness should ensure that they are accessible and effective for people with disabilities. Further research is needed to explore the health outcomes of persistent loneliness among people with/without disabilities.
Funder
National Health and Medical Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference44 articles.
1. Berkman LF, Krishna A. Social network epidemiology. In: Social Epidemiology edn. Edited by Berkman LF, Kawachi I, Glymour MM. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014: 234–289.
2. Badcock J, Holt-Lunstad J, Garcia EPB, Lim M. Position statement: addressing social isolation and loneliness and the power of human connection. In. Global Initiative on Loneliness and Connection (GILC); 2022. https://www.gilc.global/.
3. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Baker M, Harris T, Stephenson D. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a Meta-Analytic Review. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015;10:227–37.
4. Valtorta NK, Kanaan M, Gilbody S, Ronzi S, Hanratty B. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for coronary Heart Disease and Stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal observational studies. Heart 2016:1009–16.
5. Wang J, Mann F, Lloyd-Evans B, Ma R, Johnson S. Associations between loneliness and perceived social support and outcomes of mental health problems: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry 2018, 18.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献