Author:
Fagrell Trygg Nadja,Gustafsson Per E.,Hurtig Anna-Karin,Månsdotter Anna
Abstract
Abstract
Background
According to post-structural policy analyses, policies and interventions aiming at reducing social inequalities have been found to be part in producing and reifying such inequalities themselves. Given the central role of health inequalities on the public health policy agenda globally it seems important to examine the way policy on health inequalities may potentially counteract the goal of health equity. The aim of this intersectional policy analysis, was to critically analyze the representation of health inequalities in a government bill proposing a national strategy on alcohol, drugs, tobacco and gambling, to examine its performative power, and to outline alternative representations.
Method
A post-structural approach to policy analysis was combined with an intersectional framework. The material was analyzed through an interrogating process guided by the six questions of the “What’s the problem represented to be?” (WPR) approach. Thus, the underlying assumptions of the problem representation, its potential implications and historical background were explored. In a final step of the analysis we examined our own problem representations.
Results
The recommendations found in the gender and equity perspective of the bill represented the problem of health inequalities as a lack of knowledge, with an emphasis on quantitative knowledge about differences in health between population groups. Three underlying assumptions supporting this representation were found: quantification and objectivity, inequalities as unidimensional, and categorization and labelling. The analysis showed how the bill, by opting into these partly overlapping assumptions, is part of enacting a discourse on health inequalities that directs attention to specific subjects (e.g., vulnerable) with special needs (e.g., health care), in certain places (e.g., disadvantaged neighborhoods). It also showed how underlying processes of marginalization are largely neglected in the bill due to its focus on describing differences rather than solutions. Finally, we showed how different intersectional approaches could be used to complement and challenge this, potentially counteractive, problem representation.
Conclusions
The problem representation of health inequalities and its underlying assumptions may have counteractive effects on health equity, and even though some of its strengths are raised, it seems to be profoundly entangled with a system resisting the kind of change that the bill itself advocates for. If carefully used, intersectionality has the potential to support a more comprehensive and inclusive equality-promoting public health policy and practice.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference74 articles.
1. World Health Organization: Development of indicators for monitoring progress towards health for all by the year 2000.Geneva, 1981.
2. Regeringen [Government of Sweden]: Prop. 2002/03:35. Mål för folkhälsan [Targets for public health]. Stockholm, 2002. https://www.regeringen.se/contentassets/04207325e75943408c69a55643ea1d3e/mal-for-folkhalsan. Accessed 8 Nov 2021.
3. Regeringen [Government of Sweden]: Prop 2021/20:132. En förnyad strategi för politiken avseende alkohol, narkotika, dopning, tobak och nikotin samt spel om pengar 2021–2025 [A renewed strategy regarding the politics on alcohol, narcotics, doping, tobacco and gambling]. Stockholm, 2021. https://www.regeringen.se/49506b/contentassets/00420d7da29847788a7dad65075ad7d4/prop-2020-21-132.pdf. Accessed 8 Nov 2021.
4. Bacchi C. Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be?. London: Pearson; 2009.
5. Bacchi C, Goodwin S. Poststructural policy analysis: A guide to practice. New York: Palgrave Pivot; 2016.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献