Author:
Fagan Matthew James,Vanderloo Leigh M.,Banerjee Ananya,Ferguson Leah J.,Lee Eun-Young,O’Reilly Norman,Rhodes Ryan E.,Spence John C.,Tremblay Mark S.,Faulkner Guy
Abstract
AbstractSocial-ecological models suggest that a strategy for increasing population physical activity participation is to reconstruct the “social climate” through changing social norms and beliefs about physical activity (PA). In this study, we assessed whether the PA social climate in Canada has changed over a five-year period after controlling for sociodemographic factors and PA levels. Replicating a survey administered in 2018, a sample of adults in Canada (n = 2,507) completed an online survey assessing social climate dimensions, including but not limited to descriptive and injunctive norms. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and binary logistic regressions were conducted to assess the associations of sociodemographic factors and year of the survey with social climate dimensions. Results suggest some social climate constructs are trending in a positive direction between 2018 and 2023. Physical inactivity was considered a serious public health concern by 49% of respondents, second to unhealthy diets (52%). Compared to those who participated in the 2018 survey, participants in 2023 were less likely to see others walking or wheeling in their neighbourhood (OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.41, 1.78), but more likely to see people exercising (OR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.73, 0.92) and kids playing in their neighbourhood (OR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.85). No changes were reported between 2018 and 2023 in individuals’ perceptions of whether physical inactivity is due to individual versus external factors (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.87, 1.13). The findings of this work indicate a modest positive shift in some measured components of the social climate surrounding PA although attributing causes for these changes remain speculative.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference47 articles.
1. Ross R, Chaput J-P, Giangregorio LM, Janssen I, Saunders TJ, Kho ME, et al. Canadian 24-Hour Movement guidelines for adults aged 18–64 years and adults aged 65 years or older: an integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2020;45(10):57–102. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2020-0467.
2. Kraus WE, Powell KE, Haskell WL, Janz KF, Campbell WW, Jakicic JM, et al. Physical activity, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, and Cardiovascular Disease. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(6):1270. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001939.
3. Report Card Development Team. Report card on physical activity for adults: moving toward a better normal. 2021. https://www.participaction.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/2021-ParticipACTION-Report-Card-on-Physical-Activity-for-Adults.pdf. Accessed 23 July 2023.
4. Bounajm F, Dinh T, Thériault L. Moving ahead: the economic impact of reducing physical inactivity and sedentary behaviour. In: Conference Board of Canada. Conference Board of Canada = Le conference board du Canada; 2014. https://www.ualberta.ca/kinesiology-sport-recreation/media-library/research/centres-and-units/centre-for-active-living/research-update/2015-feb-sedentary.pdf. Accessed 23 July 2023.
5. Ng SW, Popkin BM. Time use and physical activity: a shift away from movement across the globe. Obes Rev. 20121;13(8):659–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00982.x.