Author:
Rongen Frédérique C.,Coosje Dijkstra S.,Hupkens Tobie H.,Vingerhoeds Monique H.,Seidell Jacob C.,van Kleef Ellen
Abstract
Abstract
Background
There is no tradition of serving school lunches in primary schools in the Netherlands. Most children tend to bring their own packed lunch, however these are often nutritionally suboptimal. While school lunch provision can aid healthy eating behavior amongst children, its introduction would constitute a profound change for children, parents and school staff. Therefore, this qualitative study aims to explore children’s, parents and school staffs’ perceptions of both the current lunch situation and the implementation of school lunch provision within primary schools in the Netherlands.
Methods
In this qualitative study we conducted nine interviews with school principals, 98 interviews with children, and held six focus groups with teachers and six with parents at primary schools in two Dutch cities. The data was analysed via iterative coding.
Results
The results showed that most children and parents are satisfied with the current lunch situation, although existing school food policies are not always put in place. Most teachers felt that children had insufficient time to consume their lunch in the current situation. The children were generally positive about the idea of a school lunch, and stressed that it was important to have the ability to choose. While both parents and school staff saw school lunch provision as an opportunity to educate families about healthy food options, they also expressed concern about who would be responsible, as well as the financial and organizational implications of its introduction.
Conclusions
Perceptions of children, parents and school staff about a school provided lunch are mixed. A complex intervention such as a new school lunch program is difficult to envisage for all parties involved and more research is needed regarding the effects, organization, logistics and the costs of school lunch provision in the Netherlands.
Funder
Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference36 articles.
1. Van Rossum C, Buurma-Rethans E, Vennemann F, Beukers M, Brants HA, De Boer E, Ocké MC. The diet of the Dutch: Results of the first two years of the Dutch National Food Consumption Survey 2012–2016. RIVM letter report 2016-0082 2016.
2. WHO. : European food and nutrition action plan 2015–2020. 2015.
3. Lake AA, Adamson AJ, Craigie AM, Rugg-Gunn AJ, Mathers JC. Tracking of dietary intake and factors associated with dietary change from early adolescence to adulthood: the ASH30 study. Obes Facts. 2009;2(3):157–65.
4. Evans C, Cleghorn C, Greenwood D, Cade J. A comparison of British school meals and packed lunches from 1990 to 2007: meta-analysis by lunch type. Br J Nutr. 2010;104(4):474–87.
5. Andersen R, Biltoft-Jensen A, Christensen T, Andersen EW, Ege M, Thorsen AV, Dalskov S-M, Damsgaard CT, Astrup A, Michaelsen KF. Dietary effects of introducing school meals based on the New Nordic Diet–a randomised controlled trial in Danish children. The OPUS School Meal Study. Br J Nutr. 2014;111(11):1967–76.