Abstract
Abstract
Background
To reduce the negative health effects from wildfire smoke exposure, effective risk and health communication strategies are vital. We estimated the behavioral effects from changes in message framing and messenger in public health messages about wildfire smoke on Facebook.
Methods
During September and October 2021, we conducted a preregistered online randomized controlled experiment in Facebook. Adult Facebook users (n = 1,838,100), living in nine wildfire-prone Western U.S. states, were randomly assigned to see one of two ad versions (narrative frame vs. informational frame) from one of two messengers (government vs. academic). We estimated the effects of narrative framing, the messenger, and their interactions on ad click-through rates, a measure of recipient information-seeking behavior.
Results
Narrative frame increased click-through rates by 25.3% (95% CI = 22.2, 28.4%), with larger estimated effects among males, recipients in areas with less frequent exposure to heavy wildfire smoke, and in areas where predominant political party affiliation of registered voters was Republican (although not statistically different from predominantly-Democrat areas). The estimated effect from an academic messenger compared to a government messenger was small and statistically nonsignificant (2.2%; 95% CI = − 0.3, 4.7%). The estimated interaction effect between the narrative framing and the academic messenger was also small and statistically nonsignificant (3.9%; 95% CI = − 1.1, 9.1%).
Conclusions
Traditional public service announcements rely heavily on communicating facts (informational framing). Shifting from a fact-focused, informational framing to a story-focused, narrative framing could lead to more effective health communication in areas at risk of wildfires and in public health contexts more broadly.
Trial registration
Date registered: August 19, 2021; Registration DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JMWUF
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference55 articles.
1. Burke M, Driscoll A, Heft-Neal S, Xue J, Burney J, Wara M. The changing risk and burden of wildfire in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2021;118(2):e2011048118.
2. Weber KT, Yadav R. Spatiotemporal trends in wildfires across the Western United States (1950–2019). Remote Sens. 2020;12(18):2959.
3. Reisen F, Duran SM, Flannigan M, Elliott C, Rideout K. Wildfire smoke and public health risk. Int J Wildland Fire. 2015;24(8):1029.
4. U.S. EPA. Wildfire Smoke and Health Risk Communication: Integrating Social and Natural Sciences to Improve Risk Communication and Management Strategies in Impacted Communities (Workshop Report, Mar 2017) [Internet]. Research Triangle Park, NC
5. 2017 Mar [cited 2021 Nov 29]. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/air-research/wildfire-smoke-and-health-risk-communication-workshop-and-report
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献