Defining indicators for the scoping stage of health impact assessment to evaluate tobacco control policy in the city of Beijing
-
Published:2023-06-06
Issue:1
Volume:23
Page:
-
ISSN:1471-2458
-
Container-title:BMC Public Health
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Public Health
Author:
Zheng Yunting,Shi Yuhui,Ji Ying,Liu Xiurong,Lin Haoxiang,Chen Meijun,Yun Qingping,Chang Chun
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Beijing initiated the nation’s most comprehensive tobacco control program that adheres to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. This study aimed to identify a set of indicators for the scoping of an Health Impact Assessment (HIA) to assess this policy.
Methods
This study used a modified Delphi process. It proposed a tobacco control health impact framework based on the Driving forces- Pressure- State- Exposure- Effect- Action model and the Determinants of Health Theory. After a review of current surveillance system and literature, a working group of 13 experts with multidisciplinary background was established to formulate indicator evaluation criteria and conduct indicator scoring. Each indicator was scored by experts according to four evaluation criteria chosen. Indicators that obtained a total score above 80% and with standard error less than 5 were selected as the final set of indicators. Kendall’s coefficient of concordance was calculated.
Results
Twenty-three out of 36 indicators were selected. Smoking prevalence, mortality rate, hospital admission rate, tobacco consumption and hospital admission fees of smoking related diseases achieved more than 90% of total scores and ranked as the top five. Kendall’s concordance coefficient was 0.218 for all indicators. For all model composition, Kendall’s concordance coefficients were statistically significant.
Conclusion
This study identified a set of twenty-three indicators for scoping of HIA of a comprehensive tobacco control policy in Beijing based on a tobacco control health impact conceptual framework. The set of indicators achieved high scores and statistically significant consistency and has great potential to promote the evaluation of tobacco control policy in a global city. Further study might use the set of indicators for HIA on tobacco control policy to analyze empirical data.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference39 articles.
1. Hoffman SJ, Mammone J, Van Rogers S, Sritharan L, Tran M, Al-Khateeb S, Grjibovski A, Gunn E, Kamali-Anaraki S, Li B, et al. Cigarette consumption estimates for 71 countries from 1970 to 2015: systematic collection of comparable data to facilitate quasi-experimental evaluations of national and global tobacco control interventions. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2019;365:l2231. 2. Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. : Survey report on tobacco use among adults in China. In. China: Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention; 2018. 3. Zhou M, Wang H, Zeng X, Yin P, Zhu J, Chen W, Li X, Wang L, Wang L, Liu Y, et al. Mortality, morbidity, and risk factors in China and its provinces, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet (London England). 2019;394(10204):1145–58. 4. Sturke R, Vorkoper S, Duncan K, Levintova M, Parascondola M. Addressing NCDs through research and capacity building in LMICs: lessons learned from tobacco control. Glob Health Action. 2016;9:32407. 5. Lv J, Su M, Hong Z, Zhang T, Huang X, Wang B, Li L. Implementation of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control in mainland China. Tob Control. 2011;20(4):309–14.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|