Author:
Richard Aude,Bruat Camille,Febvrel Didier,Squinazi Fabien,Simos Jean,Zmirou-Navier Denis,Baillon Laurent,Bex Valérie,Deroubaix Pierre,Drougard Corinne,Estecahandy Pascale,Febvrel Didier,Garrec Nathalie,Goupil Ghislaine,Kirchner Séverine,Kulig Susanne,Madec Laurent,Malou Nathalie,Marano Francelyne,Martinon Laurent,Pamies Sophie,Simos Jean,Squinazi Fabien,Zmirou-Navier Denis,
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Despite evidence of the major impact housing carries on health, many individuals still live in unhealthy dwellings. In France, the Domiscore has been proposed as a tool to assess the quality of dwellings with regard to their health impact, to allow for a better detection of unsafe housing and to improve dwellings. The aim of this paper is to present the method used to construct the Domiscore and test its relevance and usability.
Methods
The Domiscore grid, inspired by the Nutriscore, consists of 46 variables—such as air quality, light or outdoor view. Each variable is scored on a four-point scale using in situ observation, mandatory diagnostics and open access data. The sum of each variable’s score results in an overall risk score for the dwelling. The Domiscore was tested in two phases.
During the first testing phase, 11 real estate professionals, health professionals and social workers used the Domiscore for on-site visits in different geographic areas of France. They then participated in a semi-structured qualitative interview.
The second phase consisted in a public consultation with diverse stakeholders such as public authorities, housing activists and social workers, using an online survey to collect their opinions on the Domiscore’s relevance, understandability and usability.
Results
The Domiscore was tested on 28 homes. Variables completion rates were high irrespective of tester profile for all home visits (91%, SD = 4.7%). The mean time needed to fill in the grid was 1.5 h. The public consultation returned 151 responses. The Domiscore was deemed easy to understand, relevant, and rather easy to fill out. Most participants found the Domiscore useful for information gathering, awareness raising, detecting at-risk situations and agreed that it could contribute to enhance housing conditions. Its length was noted, although the inclusion of additional variables was also suggested.
Conclusions
The results of this study suggest that the Domiscore is accessible to housing specialists and other professionals for the evaluation of a dwelling’s health impacts and the standardized detection of dangerous situations. The testing process allowed for improvements in the grid and training materials for future users.
Funder
French High Council for Public Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference36 articles.
1. Samet JM, Spengler JD. Indoor environments and health: moving into the 21st century. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(9):1489–93.
2. Roué Le Gall A, Le Gall J, Potelon JL, Cuzin Y. Guide: Agir pour un urbanisme favorable à la santé, concepts & outils. EHESP/DGS; 2014. Available from: https://www.ehesp.fr/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/guide-agir-urbanisme-sante-2014-v2-opt.pdf
3. 2018 Revision of World Urbanization Prospects | Multimedia Library - United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2018. Available from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html. Cited 2022 Mar 18.
4. Klepeis NE, Nelson WC, Ott WR, Robinson JP, Tsang AM, Switzer P, et al. The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2001;11(3):231–52.
5. Krieger J, Higgins DL. Housing and health: time again for public health action. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(5):758–68.