Author:
Dykxhoorn Jennifer,Fischer Laura,Bayliss Becca,Brayne Carol,Crosby Liam,Galvin Bobbie,Geijer-Simpson Emma,Jones Oliver,Kaner Eileen,Lafortune Louise,McGrath Michael,Moehring Paula,Osborn David,Petermann Mylene,Remes Olivia,Vadgama Ami,Walters Kate
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Numerous determinants have been linked to public mental health; however, they have not been brought together in a comprehensive conceptual framework. The goal of this work was to bring together academic research, practitioner expertise, and public perspectives to create a public mental health conceptual framework.
Methods
The development process proceeded in four stages. First, we identified a comprehensive list of potential determinants through a state-of-the-art academic literature review, grey literature review, and created mind maps created by peer researchers. Next, we conducted in-person workshops, consultations, and an online survey with academics, practitioners, policy makers, and members of the public to review the potential determinants, nominate additional determinants, and prioritise determinants by importance for understanding public mental health. This iterative process resulted in the final list of determinants contained in the framework. We then conducted rapid reviews to define each determinant and to identify key research, interventions, and resources. Finally, we worked with a design team to visualise the conceptual framework as an online tool and printable infographic.
Results
We found substantial overlap between sources reflecting a shared understanding of the key drivers of public mental health. The unique determinants that emerged from each data source highlighted the importance of using multiple sources to create a comprehensive model. 72 potential determinants were prioritised through stakeholder consultations, resulting in a final list of 55 determinants and organised into four levels: individual, family, community, and structural.
Conclusions
This is the most complete conceptual framework for public mental health to date, bringing together academic research, policy and practitioner views, and lived experience perspectives. The co-production processes and tools we used provides a template for researchers looking to include multiple perspectives in their research.
The conceptual framework draws together current knowledge on each determinant, but also highlights areas where further research is needed to better understand the relationship between each factor and mental health, which can inform the research agenda. This online tool and infographic can be used by practitioners to identify interventions for promoting mental health, and by the general public as a resource to increase awareness of the broad factors which shape public mental health.
Funder
NIHR School for Public Health Research
University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre
NIHR
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference13 articles.
1. Acheson ED. On the state of the public health [The fourth Duncan lecture]. Public Health. 1988;102(5):431–7.
2. Marmot M, Allen J, Goldblatt P, Boyce T, McNeish D, Grady M. Fair society, healthy lives: the Marmot Review: strategic review of health inequalities in England post-2010. London: Department of International Development; 2019.
3. Allen J, Balfour R, Bell R, Marmot M. Social determinants of mental health. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2014;26(4):392–407.
4. Marmot M, Allen J, Boyce T, Goldblatt P, Morrison J. Health equity in England: The Marmot review 10 years on. London: Institute of Health Equity; 2020.
5. Kelly CM, Jorm AF, Wright A. Improving mental health literacy as a strategy to facilitate early intervention for mental disorders. Med J Aust. 2007;187(S7):S26-30.
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献