Author:
O’Neill Susan,Begg Stephen,Spelten Evelien
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Potentially preventable hospitalisations of ear, nose, and throat conditions in the Murray Primary Health Network region have been found to be higher than the state average of Victoria, Australia. This study aimed to examine the association between selected patient-level characteristics and the likelihood of residing in a Murray PHN postcode with higher than expected numbers of potentially preventable ENT hospitalisations.
Methods
Unit record hospital separation data were obtained from the Victorian Admitted Episodes Dataset. Postcodes were classified as having higher than expected numbers of potentially preventable hospitalisations across three subgroups of ENT using indirect standardisation techniques. Differences between patients from ‘higher than expected’ postcodes and ‘other’ postcodes with respect to the distribution of demographic and other patient characteristics were determined using chi-squared tests for each ENT subgroup. The results were confirmed by logistic regression analyses using resident of a postcode with higher than expected hospitalisations as the outcome variable.
Results
Of the 169 postcodes located in the catchment area, 15 were identified as having higher than expected numbers of upper respiratory tract infection hospitalisations, 14 were identified for acute tonsillitis, and 12 were identified for otitis media. Patients from postcodes with ‘higher than expected’ hospitalisations for these conditions were more likely than others to be aged between 0 and 9 years, Indigenous, or from a culturally and linguistically diverse background.
Conclusion
Further investigation of the identified postcodes is warranted to determine access to and utilisation of primary healthcare services in the management of PPH ENT conditions in the region.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference21 articles.
1. Duckett S, Griffiths K. ‘Perils of Place: Identifying Hotspots of Health Inequalities.’ (Grattan Institute); 2016. Available at
https://grattan.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/874-Perils-of-Place.pdf. [Verified 18 November 2021].
2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. ‘National Healthcare Agreement: PI 18-Selected potentially preventable hospitalisations, 2021.’ (Australian Government); 2021. Available at
https://meteor.aihw.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/725793. [Verified 20 November 2021].
3. Ansari Z, Carson N, Serraglio A, Barbetti T, Cicuttini F. The Victorian Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions study: reducing demand on hospital services in Victoria. Aust Health Rev. 2002;25:71.
4. Manski-Nankervis J, Furler J, Audehm R, Blackberry I, Young D. Potentially preventable hospitalisations: are they a useful marker of access to and experience of care in general practice among people with type 2 diabetes? Aust J Prim Health. 2014;21:214–20.
5. Ansari H, Ansari Z, Hutson J, Southwell B. Potentially avoidable hospitalisation for constipation in Victoria, Australia in 2010–11. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014;14:1–7.