Abstract
Abstract
Background
Prevention of opioid-involved overdose deaths remains a public health priority in the United States. While expanding access to naloxone is a national public health strategy, it is largely implemented at the state and local level, where significant variability in policies, resources, and norms exist. The aims of the current study were to examine the social context of naloxone access in three different states (Connecticut, Kentucky, Wisconsin) from the perspectives of key informants (first responders, harm reduction personnel, and pharmacists), who play some role in dispensing or administering naloxone within their communities.
Methods
Interviews were conducted with key informants who were in different local areas (urban, suburban, rural) across Connecticut, Kentucky, and Wisconsin. Interview guides explored the key informants’ experiences with administering or dispensing naloxone, and their perspectives on opioid overdose prevention efforts in their areas. Data analysis was conducted using multistage inductive coding and comparative methods to identify dominant themes within the data.
Results
Key informants in each of the three states noted progress toward expanding naloxone access, especially among people who use opioids, but also described inequities. The key role of harm reduction programs in distributing naloxone within their communities was also highlighted by participants, as well as barriers to increasing naloxone access through pharmacies. Although there was general consensus regarding the effectiveness of expanding naloxone access to prevent overdose deaths, the results indicate that communities are still grappling with stigma associated with drug use and a harm reduction approach.
Conclusion
Findings suggest that public health interventions that target naloxone distribution through harm reduction programs can enhance access within local communities. Strategies that address stigmatizing attitudes toward people who use drugs and harm reduction may also facilitate naloxone expansion efforts, overall, as well as policies that improve the affordability and awareness of naloxone through the pharmacy.
Funder
National Institute on Drug Abuse
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference59 articles.
1. Hedegaard H. Drug Overdose Deaths in the United States, 1999–2017. 2018;(329):8.
2. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control C for DC and P. Opioid Overdose [Internet]. Opioid Overdose. 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 20]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/index.html
3. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control C for DC and P. Understanding the Epidemic [Internet]. Opioid Overdose: Opioid Basics. 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 20]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/epidemic/index.html
4. Dydyk AM, Jain NK, Gupta M. Opioid Use Disorder. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 20]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK553166/
5. Compton WM, Volkow ND, Throckmorton DC, Lurie P. Expanded Access to Opioid Overdose Intervention: Research, Practice, and Policy Needs. Ann Intern Med. 2021;158(1):65–6. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-1-201301010-00013.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献