Author:
Peters Susan E.,Gundersen Daniel A.,Neidlinger Stephanie M.,Ritchie-Dunham Jim,Wagner Gregory R.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Thriving from Work is a construct that has been highlighted as an important integrative positive worker well-being indicator that can be used in both research and practice. Recent public discourse emphasizes the important contributions that work should have on workers’ lives in positive and meaningful ways and the importance of valid and reliable instruments to measure worker well-being. The Thriving from Work Questionnaire measures how workers’ experiences of their work and conditions of work contributes in positive ways to their thriving both at and outside of work.
Methods
The purpose of this study was to translate the Thriving from Work Questionnaire from English to Spanish, and then validate the translated questionnaire in a sample of 8,795 finance workers in Peru and Mexico. We used item response theory models replicating methods that were used for the original validation studies. We conducted a differential item functioning analysis to evaluate any differences in the performance of models between Peru and Mexico. We evaluated criterion validity with organizational leadership, flourishing, vitality, community well-being, and worker’s home location socio-economic position.
Results
The current study demonstrates that the Spanish (Peru/Mexico) questionnaire was found to be a reliable and valid measure of workers’ thriving from work. One item was dropped from the long-form version of the original U.S. questionnaire. Both the long and short form versions of the questionnaire had similar psychometric properties. Empirical reliability was high. Criterion validity was established as hypothesized relationships between constructs was supported. There were no differences in the performance of the model between countries suggesting utility across Latin American countries.
Conclusions
The current study demonstrated that the Spanish (Peru and Mexico) version of the questionnaire is both a reliable and valid measure of worker well-being in Latin America. Specific recommendations are made for the adaptation of the questionnaire and directions of future research.
Funder
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference21 articles.
1. Fan JK, Mustard C, Smith PM. Psychosocial work conditions and Mental Health: examining differences across Mental Illness and Well-being outcomes. Annals work Exposures Health. 2019;63(5):546–59.
2. Avendano M, Berkman LF. Labor markets, employment policies, and health. In: Social Epidemiology. Volume Second edition, edn. Edited by Lisa FBP, Ichiro Kawachi Md P, Maria Glymour Sc D. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014: 183–233.
3. Berkman LF, Kawachi I, Theorell T. Working Conditions and Health. In: Social Epidemiology. Volume Second edition, edn. Edited by Lisa FBP, Ichiro Kawachi Md P, Maria Glymour Sc D. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014: 153–181.
4. NIOSH. NIOSH worker well-being questionnaire (WellBQ), vol. DHHS (NIOSH) publication No. 2021– 110. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 2021.
5. Schulte PA, Delclos G, Felknor SA, Chosewood LC. Toward an expanded Focus for Occupational Safety and Health: a Commentary. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(24):4946.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献