Author:
Rivera Elise,Smith Cynthia,Hesketh Kylie D
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Although the health benefits of physical activity are well documented, certain priority populations are often disproportionately insufficiently active and at higher risk of poor health. Recreation centres have the potential to provide accessible and supportive environments for physical activity for all. However, little is known about priority populations’ experiences of these venues and their views of how accessibility and inclusion can be optimised. This study aimed to gain in-depth insights of recreation centre experiences and potential strategies for improving inclusion and accessibility amongst priority populations (women, older adults, ethnic minorities, persons living with disabilities/additional needs, individuals identifying as LGBTQIA+, low socio-economic position).
Methods
This qualitative study (2021–2022) involved 18 semi-structured individual interviews with adult priority population users of recreation centres (50% 65 + years, 61.2% female) in one Melbourne municipality. Participants were asked to discuss their positive and negative experiences at the centres and to identify strategies for enhancing accessibility and inclusion. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Content analysis was performed for data analysis.
Results
While many participants had positive views of the facilities and programs at the centres, as they met their needs, they also had suggestions for improving accessibility and inclusion. Similarly, most participants were happy with the communications, felt included, and perceived the culture positively. Those who did not feel included at the centres offered many potential strategies for changing the culture, modifying communications (e.g., signage), and establishing partnerships for better access and inclusion.
Conclusions
The present study adds to essential knowledge concerning priority populations’ experiences of recreation centres. For recreation facilities that were generally perceived as having positive inclusion and accessibility, the findings nonetheless highlighted suggestions for further enhancement. These strategies may be useful more broadly for improving accessibility and inclusion, thereby promoting physical activity and ultimately health for all.
Funder
YMCA Victoria
Heart Foundation Future Leader Fellowship
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference61 articles.
1. Warburton DE, Bredin SSD. Health benefits of physical activity: a systematic review of current systematic reviews. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2017;32(5):541–565.
2. World Health Organization. Gloal status report on physical activity 2022. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2022.
3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Health promotion and health protection Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare,2022 [Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/australias-health/health-promotion.
4. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, Health Equity USA. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, 2022 [Available from: cdc.gov/healthequity/whatis/index.html.
5. Parks SE, Housemann RA, Brownson RC. Differential correlates of physical activity in urban and rural adults of various socioeconomic backgrounds in the United States. J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2003;57(1):29–35.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献