Author:
Knutsen Rigmor Harang,Nielsen Morten Birkeland,Lunde Lars-Kristian,Skare Øivind,Johannessen Håkon A.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The Norwegian home care services experience a high level of sick leave, a large proportion of which is due to common mental disorders. A substantial number of such cases can be attributed to psychosocial factors at work, but more knowledge about occupation-specific risk factors is needed to develop targeted preventive measures to reduce sick leave levels. The aim of this study is to identify the most prominent psychosocial work factors influencing the risk of sick leave spells due to common mental disorders.
Methods
Employees from a random sample of 130 Norwegian home care services (N = 1.819) completed a baseline survey on 15 psychosocial work factors. Participants were subsequently followed up for 26 months using registry data on sick leave. The outcome measure was the number of medically certified sick leave spells due to common mental disorders during follow-up in the Norwegian social insurance database. Incidence risk ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using negative binomial regression with robust standard errors.
Results
Emotional dissonance (IRR 1.30, 95% CI 1.05–1.60) and emotional demands (IRR 1.35, 95% CI 1.14–1.58) were associated with an excess risk of sick leave, while control over work pacing (IRR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62–0.98) was associated with a reduced risk. An estimated 30% (95% CI 8.73–48.82) of sick leave cases were attributable to emotional dissonance and 27% (95% CI 4.80-46.33) were attributable to emotional demands. Control over work pacing was estimated to have prevented 20% (95% CI 1.32–37.78) of the sick leave cases.
Conclusions
This study found that emotional dissonance and emotional demands were robust risk factors for sick leave due to common mental disorders, and that control of work pacing constituted a robust protective factor against sick leave.
Funder
National Institute Of Occupational Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference65 articles.
1. Gjesdal S, Ringdal PR, Haug K, Maeland JG, Vollset SE, Alexanderson K. Mortality after long-term sickness absence: prospective cohort study. Eur J Public Health. 2008;18(5):517–21.
2. Lund T, Kivimaki M, Labriola M, Villadsen E, Christensen KB. Using administrative sickness absence data as a marker of future disability pension: the prospective DREAM study of Danish private sector employees. Occup Environ Med. 2008;65(1):28–31.
3. Benavides FG, Benach J, Mira M, Saez M, Barcelo A. Occupational categories and sickness absence certified as attributable to common diseases. Eur J Public Health. 2003;13(1):51–5.
4. Alexanderson K, Leijon M, Åkerlind I, Rydh H, Bjurulf P. Epidemiology of sickness absence in a Swedish countyin 1985, 1986 and 1987. Scand J Soc Med. 1994;22(1):27–34.
5. Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration. Sick leave statistics (Sykefraværsstatistikk - Årsstatistikk) [Internet]. 2022 [updated 2023 Mar 16. Available from: https://www.nav.no/no/nav-og-samfunn/statistikk/sykefravar-statistikk/sykefravaersstatistikk-arsstatistikk