Author:
Vega Crespo Bernardo,Neira Vivian Alejandra,Ortíz Segarra José,Andrade Andrés,Guerra Gabriela,Ortiz Stalin,Flores Antonieta,Mora Lorena,Verhoeven Veronique,Gama Ana,Dias Sónia,Verberckmoes Bo,Vermandere Heleen,Michelsen Kristien,Degomme Olivier
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Cervical cancer screening is a cost-effective method responsible for reducing cervical cancer-related mortality by 70% in countries that have achieved high coverage through nationwide screening strategies. However, there are disparities in access to screening. In Ecuador, although cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women, only 58.4% of women of reproductive age have ever been screened for cervical cancer.
Methodology
A qualitative study was performed to understand the current barriers to screening and to identify strategies that could increase uptake in Azuay province, Ecuador. Seven focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with under-screened women and health professionals (HPs). The FGDs were recorded and transcribed. Content analysis was done using the socio-ecological framework to categorize and analyse the data.
Results
Overall, 28 women and 27 HPs participated in the study. The two groups perceived different barriers to cervical cancer screening. The HPs considered barriers to be mainly at the policy level (lack of a structured screening plan; lack of health promotion) and the individual level (lack of risk perception; personal beliefs). The women identified barriers mainly at organizational level, such as long waiting times, lack of access to health centres, and inadequate patient–physician communication. Both groups mentioned facilitators at policy level, such as national campaigns promoting cervical cancer screening, and at community and individual level, including health literacy and women’s empowerment.
Conclusions
The women considered access to health services the main barrier to screening, while the HPs identified a lack of investment in screening programmes and cultural patterns at the community level as major obstacles. To take an integrated approach to cervical cancer prevention, the perspectives of both groups should be taken into account. Additionally, new strategies and technologies, such as self-administered human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and community participation, should be implemented to increase access to cervical cancer screening.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference61 articles.
1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49 Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33538338/ Accessed 2 Oct 2022.
2. World Health Organization. WHO guideline for screening and treatment of cervical pre-cancer lesions for cervical cancer prevention. 2nd ed: WHO; 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240030824 Accessed 2 Oct 2022
3. Canfell K, Kim JJ, Brisson M, Keane A, Simms KT, Caruana M, et al. Mortality impact of achieving WHO cervical cancer elimination targets: a comparative modelling analysis in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries. Lancet. 2020;395(10224):591–603 Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32007142/ Accessed 2 Oct 2022.
4. McGraw SL, Ferrante JM. Update on prevention and screening of cervical cancer. World J Clin Oncol. 2014;5(4):744–52. https://doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v5.i4.744 Available from:Accessed 2 Oct 2022.
5. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Ecuador Fact sheets 2020: IARC. p. 2021. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/218-ecuador-fact-sheets.pdf Accessed 2 Oct 2022
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献