The impact of third-party authorization requirements on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence

Author:

de Londras Fiona,Cleeve Amanda,Rodriguez Maria I.,Farrell Alana,Furgalska Magdalena,Lavelanet Antonella F.

Abstract

Abstract Objectives This review synthesizes legal and health evidence to demonstrate the health and human rights impacts of third-party authorization requirements (TPAs) on abortion seekers. Results The synthesized evidence substantiates the pre-existing position in international human rights law that requirements that abortion be authorized by third parties like parents, spouses, committees, and courts create barriers to abortion, should not be introduced at all, or should be repealed where they exist. Conclusions The review establishes that rights-based regulation of abortion should not impose TPAs in any circumstances. Instead, the provision and management of abortion should be treated in a manner cognizant with the general principles of informed consent in international human rights law, presuming capacity in all adults regardless of marital status and treatment sought, and recognizing the evolving capacity of young people in line with their internationally-protected rights.

Funder

Leverhulme Trust

UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), a cosponsored programme executed by the World Health Organization

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference73 articles.

1. General Comment CESCR. No. 14 (2000) The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health (Art. 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). UN Doc. E/C.12/2000/4, (11 August 2000).

2. CESCR, General Comment No. 22 (2016) on the right to sexual and reproductive health (article 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). UN Doc. E/C.12/GC/22, (2 May 2016).

3. General comment HRC No. 36 (, Doc UN. CCPR/C/GC/36, (30 October 2018), Advance unedited version.

4. UNESCO., 2005, Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, 19 October 2005.

5. WHO., 1994, A Declaration on the Promotion of Patients’ Rights in Europe, European Consultation on the Rights of Patients: Amsterdam 28–30 March 1994. ICP/HLE 121, 28 June 1994.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3