Abstract
Abstract
Background
In an ageing society, the provision of long-term care is the prime need. In Indian cultural setting, family members are the informal, albeit primary caregivers to the elderly. Caregiving demands intense emotional and financial involvement. While taking care of elderly persons’ health and wellbeing, these family members, acting as informal caregivers, may themselves become vulnerable to poor health due to additional stress and burden. Using a nationally representative survey, the study tried to identify how health condition varies within caregivers and a comparative analysis of how in similar socio-economic background health condition varies between caregivers and non-caregivers.
Method
The data, used for the analysis, is taken from Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI), Wave I. Both descriptive and multivariable regression analysis are done in different models along with interaction effect of caregiving to understand the difference in health status between caregiver and non-caregivers.
Results
Nearly 29% and 11% of the informal caregivers, reported to have depressive symptoms and poor self-rated health (SRH), respectively. Almost half of the caregivers, who provide care for more than 40 h a week, are diagnosed to have depressive symptoms. They are also at higher risk of having depressive symptoms (AOR 1.59 CI 1.16–2.18) and poor SRH (AOR 1.73 CI 1.11–2.69) than those who invest less than 40 h in a week. In almost every socio-economic condition, caregivers are at a higher risk of having depression and poor health than non-caregivers. Caregivers, who are widowed, live in rural areas or are not satisfied with current living arrangement are more vulnerable to have depressive symptoms. On the other hand, caregivers of age 45–59 years, widowed, male and who live only with their children with spouse absent, have almost 2 times higher odds of poor SRH than non-caregivers.
Conclusion
Caregivers are more susceptible to depression and poor self-rated health compared to non-caregivers irrespective of their socio-economic characteristics, only the magnitude of vulnerability varies.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference56 articles.
1. Prince MJ, Wu F, Guo Y, Robledo LM, O’Donnell M, Sullivan R, Yusuf S. The burden of disease in older people and implications for health policy and practice. The Lancet. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61347-7.
2. Ugargol AP, Hutter I, James KS, Bailey A. Caregiving patterns to older adults in India. In Extended Abstract, PAA meetings, San Diego 2015. https://paa2015.princeton.edu/papers/153320
3. Ajay S, Kasthuri A, Kiran P, Malhotra R. Association of impairments of older persons with caregiver burden among family caregivers: findings from rural South India. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2016.10.003.
4. Sebastian SI, Sekhar TV. Intergenerational care and support for elderly: evidence from Kerala State, India. In European Population Conference 2012 (pp. 1–17). https://epc2012.princeton.edu/abstracts/120232
5. Maresova P, Lee S, Fadeyi OO, Kuca K. The social and economic burden on family caregivers for older adults in the Czech Republic. BMC Geriatr. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01571-2.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献