Guiding organisational decision-making about COVID-19 asymptomatic testing in workplaces: mixed-method study to inform an ethical framework

Author:

van der Scheer Jan W.,Ansari Akbar,McLaughlin Meredith,Cox Caitríona,Liddell Kathleen,Burt Jenni,George Jenny,Kenny Rebecca,Cousens Ruth,Leach Brandi,McGowan James,Morley Katherine,Willars Janet,Dixon-Woods Mary

Abstract

Abstract Background Workplace programmes to test staff for asymptomatic COVID-19 infection have become common, but raise a number of ethical challenges. In this article, we report the findings of a consultation that informed the development of an ethical framework for organisational decision-making about such programmes. Methods We conducted a mixed-method consultation – a survey and semi-structured interviews during November–December 2020 in a UK case study organisation that had introduced asymptomatic testing for all staff working on-site in its buildings. Analysis of closed-ended survey data was conducted descriptively. An analysis approach based on the Framework Method was used for the open-ended survey responses and interview data. The analyses were then integrated to facilitate systematic analysis across themes. Inferences were based on the integrated findings and combined with other inputs (literature review, ethical analysis, legal and public health guidance, expert discussions) to develop an ethical framework. Results The consultation involved 61 staff members from the case study organisation (50 survey respondents and 11 interview participants). There was strong support for the asymptomatic testing programme: 90% of the survey respondents viewed it as helpful or very helpful. Open-ended survey responses and interviews gave insight into participants’ concerns, including those relating to goal drift, risk of false negatives, and potential negative impacts for household members and people whose roles lacked contractual and financial stability. Integration of the consultation findings and the other inputs identified the importance of a whole-system approach with appropriate support for the key control measure of isolation following positive tests. The need to build trust in the testing programme, for example through effective communication from leaders, was also emphasised. Conclusions The consultation, together with other inputs, informed an ethical framework intended to support employers. The framework may support organisational decision-making in areas ranging from design and operation of the programme through to choices about participation. The framework is likely to benefit from further consultation and refinement in new settings.

Funder

The Health Foundation

Wellcome Trust

NIHR Academic Clinical Fellow

NIHR Senior Investigator Award

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference129 articles.

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Interim guidance for SARS-CoV-2 testing in non-healthcare workplaces. 2021. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/organizations/testing-non-healthcare-workplaces.html.

2. UK Government. Get coronavirus tests for your employees. 2021. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/get-workplace-coronavirus-tests.

3. Germany Trade & Invest (GTAI). National Corona Regulations. 2022. https://www.gtai.de/en/invest/business-location-germany/entry-regulations-travel-restrictions-national-guidelines-232106.

4. Government of Canada. COVID-19 rapid testing and screening in workplaces: what employers should know. 2022. Available at: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/coronavirus-disease-covid-19/testing-screening-contact-tracing/workplace.html.

5. Safe Work Australia. COVID-19 information for workplaces: rapid antigen testing. 2022. Available at: https://covid19.swa.gov.au/covid-19-information-workplaces/industry-information/general-industry-information/rapid-antigen?tab=tab-toc-employer.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3