Author:
Yoo Paul Y.,Duncan Greg J.,Magnuson Katherine,Fox Nathan A.,Yoshikawa Hirokazu,Halpern-Meekin Sarah,Noble Kimberly G.
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Policy debates over anti-poverty programs are often marked by pernicious stereotypes suggesting that direct cash transfers to people residing in poverty encourage health-risking behaviors such as smoking, drinking, and other substance use. Causal evidence on this issue is limited in the U.S. Given the prominent role of child allowances and other forms of cash assistance in the 2021 American Rescue Plan and proposed Build Back Better legislation, evidence on the extent to which a monthly unconditional cash gift changes substance use patterns among low-income mothers with infants warrants attention, particularly in the context of economic supports that can help improve early environments of children.
Method
We employ a multi-site, parallel-group, randomized control trial in which 1,000 low-income mothers in the U.S. with newborns were recruited from hospitals shortly after the infant’s birth and randomly assigned to receive either a substantial ($333) or a nominal ($20) monthly cash gift during the early years of the infant’s life. We estimate the effect of the unconditional cash transfer on self-report measures of maternal substance use (i.e., alcohol, cigarette, or opioid use) and household expenditures on alcohol and cigarettes after one year of cash gifts.
Results
The cash gift difference of $313 per month had small and statistically nonsignificant impacts on group differences in maternal reports of substance use and household expenditures on alcohol or cigarettes. Effect sizes ranged between − 0.067 standard deviations and + 0.072 standard deviations. The estimated share of the $313 group difference spent on alcohol and tobacco was less than 1%.
Conclusions
Our randomized control trial of monthly cash gifts to mothers with newborn infants finds that a cash gift difference of $313 per month did not significantly change maternal use of alcohol, cigarettes, or opioids or household expenditures on alcohol or cigarettes. Although the structure of our cash gifts differs somewhat from that of a government-provided child allowance, our null effect findings suggest that unconditional cash transfers aimed at families living in poverty are unlikely to induce large changes in substance use and expenditures by recipients.
Trial Registration
Registered on Clinical Trials.gov NCT03593356 in July of 2018.
Funder
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health
US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation
Annie E. Casey Foundation
Arrow Impact
Bezos Family Foundation
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Bill Hammack and Janice Parmelee, BCBS of Louisiana Foundation
Brady Education Fund
Chan Zuckerberg Initiative
Child Welfare Fund
Ford Foundation
Greater New Orleans Foundation
Heising-Simons Foundation
Jacobs Foundation
JPB Foundation
J-PAL North America
Klingenstein Philanthropies
New York City Mayor's Office for Economic Opportunity
Perigee Fund
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Sherwood Foundation
Valhalla Foundation
Weitz Family Foundation
W.K. Kellogg Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference34 articles.
1. Gilens M. Why Americans hate welfare: Race, media, and the politics of antipoverty policy. University of Chicago Press; 2009.
2. Katz MB. The undeserving poor: America’s enduring confrontation with poverty: Fully updated and revised. Oxford University Press; 2013.
3. Pollack HA, Danziger S, Jayakody R, Seefeldt KS. Drug testing welfare recipients–false positives, false negatives, unanticipated opportunities. Womens Health Issues. 2002;12(1):23–31.
4. Legislature NCoS. Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients and Public Assistance 2017 [Available from: https://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/drug-testing-and-public-assistance.aspx.]
5. Smith VC, Wilson CR. Families affected by parental substance use. Pediatrics. 2016;138(2):e1-13.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献