Analysis of long-term oncological results of clinical versus pathological responses after neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer

Author:

Coraglio Mariana F.ORCID,Eleta Martin A.,Kujaruk Mirta R.,Oviedo Javier H.,Roca Enrique L.,Masciangioli Guillermo A.,Mendez Guillermo,Iseas Ilma S.

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundNonoperative management after neoadjuvant treatment in low rectal cancer enables organ preservation and avoids surgical morbidity. Our aim is to compare oncological outcomes in patients with clinical complete response in watch and wait strategy with those who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery with a pathological complete response.MethodsPatients with non-metastatic rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment with clinical complete response in watch and wait approach (group 1,n= 26) and complete pathological responders (ypT0N0) after chemoradiotherapy and surgery (group 2,n= 22), between January 2011 and October 2018, were included retrospectively, and all of them evaluated and followed in a multidisciplinary team. A comparative analysis of local and distant recurrence rates and disease-free and overall survival between both groups was carried out. Statistical analysis was performed using log-rank test, Cox proportional hazards regression model, and Kaplan-Meier curves.ResultsNo differences were found between patient’s demographic characteristics in both groups. Group 1: distance from the anal verge mean 5 cm (r= 1–12), 10 (38%) stage III, and 7 (27%) circumferential resection margin involved. The median follow-up of 47 months (r= 6, a 108). Group 2: distance from the anal verge mean 7 cm (r= 2–12), 16 (72%) stage III, and 13 (59%) circumferential resection margin involved. The median follow-up 49.5 months (r= 3, a 112). Local recurrence: 2 patients in group 1 (8.3%) and 1 in group 2 (4.8%) (p= 0.6235). Distant recurrence: 1 patient in group 1 (3.8%) and 3 in group 2 (19.2%) (p= 0.2237). Disease-free survival: 87.9% in group 1, 80% in group 2 (p= 0.7546). Overall survival: 86% in group 1 and 85% in group 2 (p= 0.5367).ConclusionOncological results in operated patients with pathological complete response were similar to those in patients under a watch and wait strategy mediating a systematic and personalized evaluation. Surgery can safely be deferred in clinical complete responders.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Oncology,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3