Author:
Zhou Long,Wei Hangyu,Li Zhiyang,Zhang Huikai,Song Ping,Cheng Li,Wang Wenju,Lei Pan,Chen Qianxue,Liu Zaiming,Ye Hui,Sun Daofa,Cai Qiang
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To explore the surgical techniques, advantages, and disadvantages of neuroendoscopic telovelar approach in the treatment of brainstem and fourth ventricle lesions.
Methods
The clinical data of 5 patients treated by neuroendoscopic telovelar approach from March 2020 to March 2022 were analyzed retrospectively.
Results
Among the 5 patients, there were 3 cavernous hemangiomas in pontine arm and 2 tumors in brainstem and fourth ventricle. All patients could successfully complete the operation, and 4 patients recovered well, other 1 patient discharged automatically for serious complications of other systems after the operation.
Conclusion
The telovelar approach has gained popularity as a safe and effective strategy for lesions in fourth ventricular and brainstem. However, without removing the posterior arch of the atlas, it is difficult to enter the upper part of the fourth ventricle under a microscope. Transcranial neuroendoscopy can effectively compensate for the shortcomings of microscopy, whether used as an auxiliary measure for microsurgery or alone with proficient endoscopic techniques, it will provide greater application in minimally invasive surgery for fourth ventricle and brainstem lesions. By utilizing the excellent degree of freedom of transcranial neuroendoscopy, there is no need to open the posterior arch of the atlas, making the surgery more minimally invasive. However, the sample size of this study is small, and it was completed under the very mature neuroendoscopic technology of our team. Its general safety and practicality still require extensive clinical research validation.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Wuhan Science and Technology Project
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference12 articles.
1. Tomasello F, Conti A, Cardali S, La Torre D, Angileri FF. Telovelar approach to fourth ventricle tumors: highlights and limitations. World Neurosurg. 2015;83:1141–7.
2. Tanriover N, Ulm AJ, Rhoton AL Jr, Yasuda A. Comparison of the transvermian and telovelar approaches to the fourth ventricle. J Neurosurg. 2004;101:484–98.
3. Jittapiromsak P, Sabuncuoglu H, Deshmukh P, Spetzler RF, Preul MC. Accessing the recesses of the fourth ventricle: comparison of tonsillar retraction and resection in the telovelar approach. Neurosurgery. 2010;66:30–9.
4. Liu R, Kasper EM. Bilateral telovelar approach: a safe route revisited for resections of various large fourth ventricle tumors. Surg Neurol Int. 2014;5:16.
5. Han S, Wang Z, Wang Y, Wu A. Transcerebellomedullary fissure approach to lesions of the fourth ventricle: less is more? Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013;155:1011–6.