Author:
Yuan Jianqiao,Zhuang Zimeng,Niu Longlong,Zhang Yuelan,Cui Shuxia,Su Hong,Chen Gui,Zhang Xin,Han Bing,Chen Si
Abstract
AbstractAim of this comparative cross-sectional study was to evaluate the effect of anterior teeth retraction and related hard and soft tissue change under physiologic anchorage control in patients with chief complain of protrusive teeth. 68 Class I or II orthodontic patients undergoing four-premolar extraction and requiring maximum or medium anchorage were included. Patients were treated with physiologic anchorage control technique (PASS group, n = 34, 18.6 ± 7.7 years, 10 male and 24 female) and self-ligation technique (Damon group, n = 34, 17.5 ± 5.4 years, 13 male and 21 female), respectively. TADs were used for anchorage reinforcement in Damon group. Pre- and post-treatment cephalograms were collected. Twenty-six skeletal, dental and soft tissue items were measured and analyzed using a blinded method. T test and paired rank-sum test were used for statistical analysis. The baseline characteristics were similar between groups (P > 0.05). After treatment, inter-group comparison showed statistically significant differences in the decrease of skeletal measurements ∠ANB (− 0.73 ± 1.05° in PASS group and − 0.25 ± 0.84° in the Damon group), Wits value (− 2.56 ± 2.29 mm in PASS group and − 0.47 ± 2.15 mm in Damon group) and soft tissue measurement UL-E (− 2.75 ± 1.36 mm in PASS group and − 2.03 ± 1.30 mm in Damon group) and the increase of FCA and Z angle, which was 2.03 ± 2.12°and 9.52 ± 4.78°in PASS group and 0.97 ± 2.12°and 6.96 ± 4.43°in Damon group, respectively (P < 0.05). Our results indicated that significant anterior teeth retraction and profile improvement could be achieved with PASS technique without additional anchorage devices. Appropriate application of physiologic anchorage control could reduce the dependence of TADs for anterior teeth retraction.
Funder
Medical Science and Technology Project of Henan Province
National Natural Science Foundations of China
Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Key Research and Development Program
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference22 articles.
1. Lundstrom A, Cooke MS. Proportional analysis of the facial profile in natural head position in Caucasian and Chinese children. Br J Orthod. 1991;18(1):43–9. https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.18.1.43.
2. Chong HT, Thea KW, Descallar J, Chen Y, Dalci O, Wong R, et al. Comparison of White and Chinese perception of esthetic Chinese lip position. Angle Orthod. 2014;84(2):246–53. https://doi.org/10.2319/031213-212.1.
3. Rajesh M, Kishore M, Shetty KS. Comparison of anchorage loss following initial leveling and aligning using ROTH and MBT Prescription—A clinical prospective study. J Int Oral Health JIOH. 2014;6(2):16–21.
4. Liu Y, Yang ZJ, Zhou J, Xiong P, Wang Q, Yang Y, et al. Comparison of anchorage efficiency of orthodontic mini-implant and conventional anchorage reinforcement in patients requiring maximum orthodontic anchorage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2020;20(2):101401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2020.101401.
5. Klontz HA. Tweed-Merrifield sequential directional force treatment. Semin Orthod. 1996;2(4):254–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1073-8746(96)80025-9.