Author:
Gómez-Acebo Inés,Llorca Javier,Alonso-Molero Jessica,Díaz-Martínez Marta,Pérez-Gómez Beatriz,Amiano Pilar,Belmonte Thalía,Molina Antonio J.,Burgui Rosana,Castaño-Vinyals Gemma,Moreno Víctor,Molina-Barceló Ana,Marcos-Gragera Rafael,Kogevinas Manolis,Pollán Marina,Dierssen-Sotos Trinidad
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
To build models combining circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) able to identify women with breast cancer as well as different types of breast cancer, when comparing with controls without breast cancer.
Method
miRNAs analysis was performed in two phases: screening phase, with a total n = 40 (10 controls and 30 BC cases) analyzed by Next Generation Sequencing, and validation phase, which included 131 controls and 269 cases. For this second phase, the miRNAs were selected combining the screening phase results and a revision of the literature. They were quantified using RT-PCR. Models were built using logistic regression with LASSO penalization.
Results
The model for all cases included seven miRNAs (miR-423-3p, miR-139-5p, miR-324-5p, miR-1299, miR-101-3p, miR-186-5p and miR-29a-3p); which had an area under the ROC curve of 0.73. The model for cases diagnosed via screening only took in one miRNA (miR-101-3p); the area under the ROC curve was 0.63. The model for disease-free cases in the follow-up had five miRNAs (miR-101-3p, miR-186-5p, miR-423-3p, miR-142-3p and miR-1299) and the area under the ROC curve was 0.73. Finally, the model for cases with active disease in the follow-up contained six miRNAs (miR-101-3p, miR-423-3p, miR-139-5p, miR-1307-3p, miR-331-3p and miR-21-3p) and its area under the ROC curve was 0.82.
Conclusion
We present four models involving eleven miRNAs to differentiate healthy controls from different types of BC cases. Our models scarcely overlap with those previously reported.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC