Clinical impact of IDH1 mutations and MGMT methylation in adult glioblastoma
-
Published:2024-03-28
Issue:1
Volume:25
Page:
-
ISSN:2090-2441
-
Container-title:Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Egypt J Med Hum Genet
Author:
Mahmoud Magda Sayed, Khalifa Mohamed K., Nageeb Amira M., El-Arab Lobna R. Ezz, El-Mahdy Manal, Ramadan Amal, Hashim Maha, Bakr Noha M., Swellam MenhaORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Impact of Isocitrate dehydrogenase1 (IDH1) and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) in glioblastoma (GBM) have been of great interest due to their implications in prediction of prognosis of several types of cancer. It was aimed to investigate the clinical role of IDH1 mutation and MGMT methylation pattern among GBM patients versus non-neuro-oncological diseases (NND) patients and their impact on survival criteria.
Methods
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections of 58 GBM and 20 non-neuro-oncological diseases patients were recruited and IDH1 mutation and MGMT methylation was detected using Cast-PCR technology and Methyl II quantitative PCR approach, respectively. Results were assessed with other clinicopathological criteria and survival patterns.
Results
IDH1 mutation was detected among 15 GBM cases (15/58) and it was not reported among NND (P = 0.011). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to discriminate between MGMT methylation among studied groups. Patients with MGMT methylation ≥ 66% were reported as high methylation, which was recorded significantly in 51.7% and 100% of GBM cases and NND, respectively. Both showed significant difference with performance status, while MGMT methylation was significantly related with tumor size and tumor location. IDH1 mutation and MGMT methylation reported significant increase with GB patients revealed complete response to treatment. Survival pattern was better for IDH1 mutation and MGMT high methylation as compared to IDH1 wild type or MGMT low–moderate methylation, respectively, and favorable survival was detected when both were combined than using either of them alone.
Conclusion
Detection of IDH1 mutation and MGMT methylation among GB patients could aid in prediction of their response to treatment and their survival patterns, and their combination is better than using any of them alone.
Funder
Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) Basic and Applied Research Support Grant Project Science Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) through Capacity Building Grant Fund
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Pandith AA, Qasim I, Baba SM, Koul A, Zahoor W, Afroze D, Lateef A, Manzoor U, Bhat IA, Sanadhya D, Bhat AR, Ramzan AU, Mohammad F, Anwar I. Favorable role of IDH1/2 mutations aided with MGMT promoter gene methylation in the outcome of patients with malignant glioma. Future Sci OA. 2020;7(3):FSO663. https://doi.org/10.2144/fsoa-2020-0057. 2. Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Taphoorn MJ, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Allgeier A, Fisher B, Belanger K, Hau P, Brandes AA, Gijtenbeek J, Marosi C, Vecht CJ, Mokhtari K, Wesseling P, Villa S, Eisenhauer E, Gorlia T, Weller M, Lacombe D, Cairncross JG, Mirimanoff RO; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumour and Radiation Oncology Groups; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(5):459-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7. 3. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, Belanger K, Brandes AA, Marosi C, Bogdahn U, Curschmann J, Janzer RC, Ludwin SK, Gorlia T, Allgeier A, Lacombe D, Cairncross JG, Eisenhauer E, Mirimanoff RO, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor and Radiotherapy Groups; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352(10):987–96. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043330. 4. Verdugo E, Puerto I, Medina MÁ (2022) An update on the molecular biology of glioblastoma, with clinical implications and progress in its treatment. Cancer Commun 42(11):1083–1111. https://doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12361 5. Torrisi F, Alberghina C, D’Aprile S, Pavone AM, Longhitano L, Giallongo S, Tibullo D, Di Rosa M, Zappalà A, Cammarata FP, Russo G, Ippolito M, Cuttone G, Li Volti G, Vicario N, Parenti R (2022) The hallmarks of glioblastoma: heterogeneity, intercellular crosstalk and molecular signature of invasiveness and progression. Biomedicines 10(4):806. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10040806
|
|