Abstract
Abstract
Individual unemployment accounts (IUAs) attenuate the moral hazard attached to unemployment insurance. However, the available literature provides no policy recommendation about what percentage of the contributions should go to IUAs. We propose criteria of actuarial neutrality and use a simple job search model to argue that a sizable proportion of the contributions could go to IUAs without changing benefits and contribution rates, and therefore not negatively affecting well-being. We derive this result from a model, first, and then use simulations to show that it also holds in more realistic settings and different labor market dynamics.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Economics and Econometrics,Industrial relations
Reference24 articles.
1. Acevedo, G., Eskenazi, P., Pagés, C. Unemployment insurance in Chile: a new model of income support for unemployed workers. Social Protection Discussion Papers, World Bank, No 0612. 2006
2. Baily M (1978) Some aspects of optimal unemployment insurance. J Public Econ 10:379–402
3. Bovenberg AL, Sørensen PB (2004) Improving the equity-efficiency trade-off: mandatory savings accounts for social insurance. Int Tax Public Financ 11:507–529
4. Card D, Chetty R, Weber A (2007) The spike at benefit exhaustion: leaving the unemployment system or starting a new job? Am Econ Rev 97:113–118
5. Chetty R (2006) A general formula for the optimal level of social insurance. J Public Econ 90(2006):1879–1901
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Optimal unemployment accounts based on observable parameters;The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review;2023-04-18
2. Toward an Integrated Policy Response;Employment in Crisis: The Path to Better Jobs in a Post-COVID-19 Latin America;2021-01-03