Abstract
AbstractRecent sustainable building strategies make the right decisions to be environmentally friendly and reduce carbon emissions. In some reinforced concrete (RC) elements, fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) bars have been proposed as an alternative to conventional steel bars. The demand for using noncorrosive and/or nonmetallic reinforcing bars in various reinforced concrete projects has increased. Although these concrete elements are lightweight, have a long lifespan, and need little maintenance, their non-ductile nature and bond with the surrounding concrete create significant challenges. Several experimental investigations have been conducted to evaluate the behavior of RC elements, even with their high cost. This study aims to assess numerically the viability of using FRP bars instead of traditional steel ones in simply supported reinforced concrete beams (RCBs) as longitudinal reinforcement (passive reinforcement). Utilizing the three-dimensional (3D) nonlinear finite element analysis (FEA) software (ABAQUS), a total of eighteen models were carried out to validate the results available in reference case studies with FRP bars. The verification of the numerical results has been verified by comparing them with the reference experimental data. Next, in order to assess the rigidity of such RCBs with FRP bars, parametric research was carried out. The numerical results proved that RCBs with FRP bars have a positive impact on enhancing load-carrying capacities. But on the other hand, the strain energy of such RCBs with CFRP bars is reduced to about 75% of the strain energy of RCBs with steel bars, which leads to low beam ductility.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference26 articles.
1. Sammen SS, Ahmed QW, l-Karawi SN (2019) Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis of Concrete Beam Reinforced with Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRM). In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol 518. IOP Publishing, p 022086
2. Suryanto B, Morgan R, Han AL (2016) Predicting the response of shear-critical reinforced concrete beams using response-2000 and SNI 2847: 2013. Civil Eng Dimension 18(1):16–24
3. Einde L, Zhao L, Seible F (2003) Use of FRP composites in civil structural applications. Constr Build Mater 17:389–403
4. ACI Committee (2001) Guide for the design and construction of concrete reinforced with FRP bars. American Concrete Institute
5. Afifi M, Mohamed H, Benmokrane B. (2013) axial capacity of circular concrete columns reinforced with GFRP bars and spirals. Am Soc Civil Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000438