Abstract
AbstractRecently, given the rise of emerging demands on intelligent technological systems, increasing attention has been given to proliferating and enhancing the adaptation capacities of self-adaptive systems (SAS), which are capable of adapting their behavior to changes in the context or system resources contributing to overcome the complexity of today’s software-intensive systems. However, there are a significant number of challenges for developing adaptations on the SAS, such as simplifying the designer’s task, improving responsiveness, and reducing the conflicts between its adaptations. This study focuses on simplifying the designers’ tasks by utilizing independent designers’ viewpoints on context modeling. We proposed several solutions for solving the conflicts among different viewpoints of designers in the layer of context-aware management (CAM). The validation results are promising and show that our method effectively provides a solution that supports the problem of using independent viewpoints in the context modeling process and improves the SAS adaptation capacity.
Funder
The University of Danang, University of Science and Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference25 articles.
1. Vandana B, Purkayastha, Kumar A (2020) Issues and Challenges in Management related to Information Technology. Int J Comput Digit Syst. 9(4):703–713
2. T C Do, G Rey, JY Tigli, S Lavirotte, N, Le Thanh (2019) “From BPMN to Live Application: How the Context Can Drive an Auto-Adapted System”, 2019 IEEE-RIVF International Conference on Computing and Communication Technologies, pp. 1–6
3. Macías-Escrivá FD, Haber R, Del Toro R, Hernandez V (2013) Self-adaptive systems: A survey of current approaches, research challenges and applications. Expert Syst Appl 40(18):7267–7279
4. Krupitzer, Christian et al (2015) A survey on engineering approaches for self-adaptive systems. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 17:184–206
5. Wang WM, Ting SL (2011) Development of a computational simulation model for conflict management in team building. Int Journal of Engineering Business Management 3:9–15