Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To study the effect of agitation and temperature on biofilm formation (cell aggregates embedded within a self-produced matrix) by pathogenic bacteria isolated from Raw cow milk (RCM).
Methods
A 40 RCM samples were gathered from eight dairy farms in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. After bacterial culturing and isolation, gram staining was performed, and all pathogenic, identified using standard criteria established by Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ), and non-pathogenic bacteria were identified using VITEK-2 and biochemical assays. To evaluate the effects of temperature and agitation on biofilm formation, isolated pathogenic bacteria were incubated for 24 h under the following conditions: 4 °C with no agitation (0 rpm), 15 °C with no agitation, 30 °C with no agitation, 30 °C with 60 rpm agitation, and 30 °C with 120 rpm agitation. Then, biofilms were measured using a crystal violet assay.
Results
Of the eight farm sites, three exhibited non-pathogenic bacterial contamination in their raw milk samples. Of the total of 40 raw milk samples, 15/40 (37.5%; from five farms) were contaminated with pathogenic bacteria. Overall, 346 bacteria were isolated from the 40 samples, with 329/346 (95.1%) considered as non-pathogenic and 17/346 (4.9%) as pathogenic. Most of the isolated pathogenic bacteria exhibited a significant (p < 0.01) increase in biofilm formation when grown at 30 °C compared to 4 °C and when grown with 120 rpm agitation compared to 0 rpm.
Conclusion
Herein, we highlight the practices of consumers in terms of transporting and storing (temperature and agitation) can significantly impact on the growth of pathogens and biofilm formation in RCM.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference43 articles.
1. Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ). Microbiological Risk Assessment of Raw Cow Milk. Risk Assessment Microbiology Section. December 2009. Available online: Microsoft Word - P1007 PPPS for raw milk 1AR SD1 Cow milk Risk Assessment.doc (foodstandards.gov.au) (accessed on 20 March 2022).
2. Claeys WL, Cardoen S, Daube G, De Blok J, Dewettinck K, Dierick K, et al. Raw or heated cow milk consumption: review of risks and benefits. Food Control. 2013;31:251–62.
3. Oliver SP, Boor KJ, Murphy SC, Murinda SE. Food Safety Hazards Associated with Consumption of Raw Milk. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2009;6:793–806.
4. Mufandaedza J, Viljoen BC, Feresu SB, Gadaga TH. Antimicrobial properties of lactic acid bacteria and yeast-LAB cultures isolated from traditional fermented milk against pathogenic Escherichia coli and Salmonella enteridis strains. Int J Food Microbiol. 2006;108:147–52.
5. Mungai EA, Behravesh CB, Gould LH. Increased outbreaks associated with nonpasteurized milk, United States, 2007–2012. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:119–22.